Reliability analysis with stratified importance sampling based on adaptive Kriging

被引:102
作者
Xiao, Sinan [1 ]
Oladyshkin, Sergey [1 ]
Nowak, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Dept Stochast Simulat & Safety Res Hydrosyst, IWS, LS3, Pfaffenwaldring 5a, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Reliability analysis; Stratified importance sampling; Variance-based sensitivity measure; Kriging; Adaptive learning; SMALL FAILURE PROBABILITIES; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SUBSET SIMULATION; LEARNING-FUNCTION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; ALGORITHM; REGIONS; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.106852
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In reliability engineering, estimating the failure probability of a system is one of the most challenging tasks. Since many applied engineering tasks are computationally expensive, it is challenging to estimate failure probabilities using acceptable computational costs. In this paper, to reduce computational cost, we combine a stratified importance sampling method with an adaptive Kriging strategy to estimate failure probabilities. Compared to the importance sampling method, stratified importance sampling needs fewer samples to get an estimate of failure probability with the same coefficient of variation. In the proposed method, we improve the importance sampling density and determine the best input variable for stratification through a Kriging-based model surrogate technique (like a Gaussian process regression). Then, the Kriging surrogate is further adaptively improved to get an accurate estimate of failure probability. The efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated using several analytic examples and then transferred to a carbon dioxide storage benchmark problem.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[31]   Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel [J].
Marrel, Amandine ;
Iooss, Bertrand ;
Laurent, Beatrice ;
Roustant, Olivier .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (03) :742-751
[32]   A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE [J].
MCKAY, MD ;
BECKMAN, RJ ;
CONOVER, WJ .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) :239-245
[33]  
Melchers R.E., 2018, STRUCTURAL RELIABILI, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119266105
[34]   STRUCTURAL SYSTEM RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT USING DIRECTIONAL SIMULATION [J].
MELCHERS, RE .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1994, 16 (1-2) :23-37
[35]   IMPORTANCE SAMPLING IN STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS [J].
MELCHERS, RE .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1989, 6 (01) :3-10
[36]  
Neal RM, 2003, ANN STAT, V31, P705, DOI 10.1214/aos/1056562461
[37]   Directional methods for structural reliability analysis [J].
Nie, J ;
Ellingwood, BR .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2000, 22 (03) :233-249
[38]   Injection and storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers:: Analytical solution for CO2 plume evolution during injection [J].
Nordbotten, JM ;
Celia, MA ;
Bachu, S .
TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2005, 58 (03) :339-360
[39]   Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion [J].
Oladyshkin, S. ;
Nowak, W. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 106 :179-190
[40]   Accelerated subset simulation with neural networks for reliability analysis [J].
Papadopoulos, Vissarion ;
Giovanis, Dimitris G. ;
Lagaros, Nikos D. ;
Papadrakakis, Manolis .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 223 :70-80