PROBABILISTIC GUARANTEES IN ROBUST OPTIMIZATION

被引:15
作者
Bertsimas, Dimitris [1 ]
den Hertog, Dick [2 ]
Pauphilet, Jean [3 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ & Business, NL-1001 NL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
关键词
robust optimization; support function; uncertainty set; concentration inequality; JOINT CHANCE CONSTRAINTS; A-PRIORI; RANDOMIZED SOLUTIONS; FACILITY LOCATION; CONVEX-PROGRAMS; UNCERTAINTY; BOUNDS; APPROXIMATIONS;
D O I
10.1137/21M1390967
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We develop a general methodology for deriving probabilistic guarantees for solutions of robust optimization problems. Our analysis applies broadly to any convex compact uncertainty set and to any constraint affected by uncertainty in a concave manner, under minimal assumptions on the underlying stochastic process. Namely, we assume that the coordinates of the noise vector are light-tailed (sub-Gaussian) but not necessarily independent. We introduce the notion of robust complexity of an uncertainty set, which is a robust analogue of the Rademacher and Gaussian complexities encountered in high-dimensional statistics, and which connects the geometry of the uncertainty set with an a priori probabilistic guarantee. Interestingly, the robust complexity involves the support function of the uncertainty set, which also plays a crucial role in the robust counterpart theory for robust linear and nonlinear optimization. For a variety of uncertainty sets of practical interest, we are able to compute it in closed form or derive valid approximations. Our methodology recovers most of the results available in the related literature using first principles and extends them to new uncertainty sets and nonlinear constraints. We also derive improved a posteriori bounds, i.e., significantly tighter bounds which depend on the resulting robust solution.
引用
收藏
页码:2893 / 2920
页数:28
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Uncertain convex programs: randomized solutions and confidence levels [J].
Calafiore, G ;
Campi, MC .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2005, 102 (01) :25-46
[12]   The scenario approach to robust control design [J].
Calafiore, Giuseppe C. ;
Campi, Marco C. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2006, 51 (05) :742-753
[13]   THE EXACT FEASIBILITY OF RANDOMIZED SOLUTIONS OF UNCERTAIN CONVEX PROGRAMS [J].
Campi, M. C. ;
Garatti, S. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 19 (03) :1211-1230
[14]   From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization [J].
Chen, Wenqing ;
Sim, Melvyn ;
Sun, Jie ;
Teo, Chung-Piaw .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (02) :470-485
[15]  
Chen Z, 2018, ARXIV180900210
[16]   On constraint sampling in the linear programming approach to approximate dynamic programming [J].
de Farias, DP ;
Van Roy, B .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 29 (03) :462-478
[17]   Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems [J].
Delage, Erick ;
Ye, Yinyu .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (03) :595-612
[18]   Percentile Optimization for Markov Decision Processes with Parameter Uncertainty [J].
Delage, Erick ;
Mannor, Shie .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (01) :203-213
[19]   Rates of convergence for random approximations of convex sets [J].
Dumbgen, L ;
Walther, G .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1996, 28 (02) :384-393
[20]   Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization [J].
Erdogan, E ;
Iyengar, G .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2006, 107 (1-2) :37-61