Productivity and quality of rooster tree in different planting densities and planting systems

被引:23
作者
Meira de Andrade, Maria Veronica
da Silva, Divan Soares
de Andrade, Albericio Pereira
de Medeiros, Ariosvaldo Nunes
Pimenta Filho, Edgard Cavalcanti
Duarte Candido, Magno Jose
de Caldas Pinto, Maria do Socorro
机构
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2008年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Calotropis procera; native forage; semi-arid zone; soil management; xerophytic plant;
D O I
10.1590/S1516-35982008000100001
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The effect of two soil handling systems was evaluated (without furrow and with furrow), three spacing (1.0 m x 1.5 m; 1.5 m x 2.0 m and 2.0 m x 2.0 m) on the quality and the productivity of rooster tree 60 days after cut. It was used a split-plot (space and time) factorial arrangement in a randomized block design. Factors were two soil handling systems and three planting densities (2 x 3) with five replications per treatment. Plants chosen randomly were cut, separated in accordance with treatments and analyed the contents of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, water soluble carbohydrates (WSC), total carbohydrates (TC), and productivity (DM kg/ha). It was observed that the soil handling systems and planting densities did not influence the OM, MM, NDF, EE, lignin, cellulose, WSC and TC. The planting density affected the DM, hemicellulose, and ADF. The CP concentration was lower when using the handling systems with furrow. The DM largest productivity (699.72 kg MS/ha) of the rooster tree was verified in the more dense population (1.0 m x 1.5 m), corresponding to 6,666 plants/ha.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] ABBAS B, VET RECORD, V131, P132
  • [2] ARAUJO GGL, 1998, C NORD PROD AN, V1, P87
  • [3] EMBRAPA, 2018, EMPR BRAS PESQ AGR S, V5
  • [4] FILHO JAA, 1995, REUN AN SOC BRAS ZOO, V32, P63
  • [5] Forsythe W, 1975, FISICA SUELOS MANUAL, P212
  • [6] HEATH ME, 1985, FORAGE SCI GRASSLAND
  • [7] KOPPEN W, 1936, HDB KLIMATOLOGIA, V1
  • [8] Lemos R., 1996, MANUAL DESCRICAO COL
  • [9] NORTON BW, 1981, NUTR LIMITS ANIMAL P, P89
  • [10] NOZELLA EF, 2001, REUNIAO ANUAL SOC BR, V38, P1242