Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic Factors

被引:67
作者
Chhatwal, Jagpreet [1 ]
Alagoz, Oguzhan [2 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Merck Res Labs, N Wales, PA 19454 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
CANCER-SOCIETY GUIDELINES; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; FALSE-NEGATIVE RATE; CORE-NEEDLE-BIOPSY; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; DATABASE FORMAT; LESIONS; RADIOLOGISTS;
D O I
10.1287/opre.1100.0877
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer affecting women in the United States, where every year more than 20 million mammograms are performed. Breast biopsy is commonly performed on the suspicious findings on mammograms to confirm the presence of cancer. Currently, 700,000 biopsies are performed annually in the U. S.; 55%-85% of these biopsies ultimately are found to be benign breast lesions, resulting in unnecessary treatments, patient anxiety, and expenditures. This paper addresses the decision problem faced by radiologists: When should a woman be sent for biopsy based on her mammographic features and demographic factors? This problem is formulated as a finite-horizon discrete-time Markov decision process. The optimal policy of our model shows that the decision to biopsy should take the age of patient into account; particularly, an older patient's risk threshold for biopsy should be higher than that of a younger patient. When applied to the clinical data, our model outperforms radiologists in the biopsy decision-making problem. This study also derives structural properties of the model, including sufficiency conditions that ensure the existence of a control-limit type policy and nondecreasing control-limits with age.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1591
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation
    Alagoz, O
    Maillart, LM
    Schaefer, AJ
    Roberts, MS
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (10) : 1420 - 1430
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1965, MATH THEORY RELIABIL
  • [4] [Anonymous], BREAST IM REP DAT SY
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, Breast Cancer facts and figures 2009-2010
  • [6] Arias Elizabeth, 2006, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V54, P1
  • [7] Breast Cancer Risk Estimation With Artificial Neural Networks Revisited Discrimination and Calibration
    Ayer, Turgay
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    Chhatwal, Jagpreet
    Shavlik, Jude W.
    Kahn, Charles E., Jr.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (14) : 3310 - 3321
  • [8] A tangled web: Factors likely to affect the efficacy of screening mammography
    Baines, CJ
    Dayan, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (10) : 833 - 838
  • [9] BREAST-CANCER - PREDICTION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ON BI-RADS STANDARDIZED LEXICON
    BAKER, JA
    KORNGUTH, PJ
    LO, JY
    WILLIFORD, ME
    FLOYD, CE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (03) : 817 - 822
  • [10] Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists
    Barlow, WE
    Chi, C
    Carney, PA
    Taplin, SH
    D'Orsi, C
    Cutter, G
    Hendrick, RE
    Elmore, JG
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (24): : 1840 - 1850