Participatory Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the User-Friendly Patient Information Material Checklist (UPIM-Check)

被引:5
作者
Salm, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
Mollenhauer, Judith [1 ,2 ]
Hornbach, Carolin [1 ,2 ]
Cecon, Natalia [1 ,2 ]
Dresen, Antje [1 ,2 ]
Houwaart, Stefanie [3 ]
Arning, Anna [4 ]
Goettel, Andrea [4 ]
Schwickerath, Kathrin [4 ]
Pfaff, Holger [1 ,2 ]
Scholten, Nadine [1 ,2 ]
Krieger, Theresia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Inst Med Sociol Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci IMVR, Eupener Str 129, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Inst Med Sociol Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci IMVR, Eupener Str 129, D-50933 Cologne, Germany
[3] House Canc Patient Support Assoc Germany HKSH BV, Thomas Mann Str 40, D-53111 Bonn, Germany
[4] Canc Soc North Rhine Westphalia KG NRW, Volmerswerther Str 20, D-40221 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
quality assessment instrument; instrument development; psychometric properties; pilot study; patient information material; patient engagement; service provider engagement; EDUCATION MATERIALS; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; QUALITY; CANCER; SUITABILITY; COEFFICIENT; INSTRUMENT; DISCERN;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18168773
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were (1) to design a user-friendly instrument to assess and optimize patient information material (PIM), (2) to develop an English version, and (3) to test its psychometric properties. The instrument was needed to optimize the top-down developed PIM of the psycho-oncological care programme isPO. First, a literature-based PIM checklist was developed by a team of patient representatives, cancer care experts and professional researchers. Next, the checklist's reliability and validity were analysed by having cancer survivors assess the initial and optimized version of the isPO-leaflet. The User-friendly Patient Information Material Checklist (UPIM-Check), developed participatorily, was found to be effective for evaluating PIM. It uses a traffic light scale, and suggestions for improvement can be given for each criterion. Its reliability appeared to be excellent (alpha = 0.927). The optimized leaflet was rated significantly better than the initial one. The UPIM-Check is a reliable and valid instrument, which enables end-users (e.g., patients) to assess and optimize the quality of PIM according to scientific criteria and the needs of end-users. A bottom-up approach was essential for developing and validating the UPIM-Check. End-users constantly contributed with their specific knowledge. Thus, their position as co-researchers was significantly strengthened.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Quality, Readability, and Understandability of German Booklets Addressing Melanoma Patients [J].
Bruetting, Julia ;
Reinhardt, Lydia ;
Bergmann, Maike ;
Schadendorf, Dirk ;
Weber, Christiane ;
Tilgen, Wolfgang ;
Berking, Carola ;
Meier, Friedegund .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (04) :760-767
[2]   The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice [J].
Cargo, Margaret ;
Mercer, Shawna L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 29 :325-350
[3]   DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices [J].
Charnock, D ;
Shepperd, S ;
Needham, G ;
Gann, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) :105-111
[4]   TEMPtEd: development and psychometric properties of a tool to evaluate material used in patient education [J].
Clayton, Laura H. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (10) :2229-2238
[5]  
Cornwall A., 1996, PARTICIPATORY RES HL, P94
[6]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[7]  
Doak C.C., 1996, ASSESSING SUITABILIT
[8]   Patient engagement in research: a systematic review [J].
Domecq, Juan Pablo ;
Prutsky, Gabriela ;
Elraiyah, Tarig ;
Wang, Zhen ;
Nabhan, Mohammed ;
Shippee, Nathan ;
Brito, Juan Pablo ;
Boehmer, Kasey ;
Hasan, Rim ;
Firwana, Belal ;
Erwin, Patricia ;
Eton, David ;
Sloan, Jeff ;
Montori, Victor ;
Asi, Noor ;
Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[9]  
European Social Survey, ESS ROUND 9TRANSL GU
[10]  
Fayers PM, 2016, QUALITY LIFE, VThird, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470024522.CH7