Performance Evaluation of Court in Construction Claims Settlement of Litigation

被引:5
作者
Hayati, Kemala [1 ]
Latief, Yusuf [1 ]
Rarasati, Ayomi Dita [1 ]
Siddik, Arief [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dept Civil Engn, Depok, Indonesia
来源
GREEN PROCESS, MATERIAL, AND ENERGY: A SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE | 2017年 / 1855卷
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.4985471
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Claim construction has a major influence on the implementation of projects, such as the cost and time. The success of the construction project is highly dependent on the effective resolution of claims. Although it has been recognized that litigation or court is not the best way because it may reduce or eliminate profits and damage the relationship, it is a method of resolving claims and disputes that is common in the world of construction. The method of resolving claims and disputes through litigation or court may solve the problem in an alternative method, namely the implementation of the judgment which can be enforced effectively against the losing party and the ruling which has the force of law of the country where the claims and disputes are examined. However, litigation or court may take longer time and require high cost. Thus, it is necessary to identify factors affecting the performance of the court and to develop a system capable of improving an existing system in order to run more effectively and efficiently. Resolution in the claims management of construction projects with the method of litigation is a procedure that can be used by the courts in order to shorten the time in order to reduce the cost. The scope of this research is directed to all parties involved in the construction, both the owners and the contractors as implementers and practitioners, as well as experts who are experienced in construction law.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Process model for administrating construction claims [J].
Abdul-Malak, MAU ;
El-Saadi, MMH ;
Abou-Zeid, MG .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2002, 18 (02) :84-94
[2]   An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical network process [J].
Cakmak, Emre ;
Cakmak, Pinar Irlayici .
2ND WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 109 :183-187
[3]  
Chovichien V., 2006, TECHN INN SUST DEV C
[4]  
Gandasubrata P. S., 1998, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, P21
[5]  
Harmon K.M.J., 2003, LEADERSHIP MANAGEMEN, V3, P187, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)
[6]  
Kululanga G. K., J CONSTRUCTION ENG M, V127, P309
[7]  
Monoarfa H., EFFECTIVENESS EFFICI
[8]  
Pinnell S., 1999, DISPUTE RESOLUT J, V54, P16
[9]  
Sgarlata M. A., 2004, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEM
[10]   Multiple claims in construction law: Educational case study [J].
Singh, A ;
Sakamoto, I .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2001, 127 (03) :122-129