Modeling of laboratory and commercial scale hydro-proces sing reactors using CFD

被引:47
作者
Gunjal, Prashant R. [1 ]
Ranade, Vivek V.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Energy Environm & Chem Engn, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Natl Chem Lab, Ind Flow Modeling Grp, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
关键词
trickle bed; CFD; hydro processing; scale-up; scale-down;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.078
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Trickle bed reactors (TBRs) are commonly used in chemical industries. Scale-up of TBR is difficult and simple scaling rules often lead to poor design. Flow mal-distribution, channeling, wetting of catalyst and local temperature variation are some of the important parameters which controls the overall performance of the TBRs. Fluid dynamics of the TBRs is complex and very sensitive to the scale of the reactors. Conventional modeling techniques are unable to account these key design issues. Recent advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) show promising results in understanding fluid dynamics and its interactions with chemical reactions. In this study we have developed a CFD model for simulating flow and reactions in the laboratory scale and commercial scale reactors. A case of hydro-processing reactions was considered. The CFD models were first evaluated by comparing the model predictions with the published experimental data. The models were then used to understand the influence of porosity distribution, particle characteristics and reactor scale on overall performance. Validated model was used to predict the performance of the commercial scale reactor. Various critical issues of scaling of TBR and how CFD modeling can help in reducing uncertainties associated with it are discussed in details. The approach, model and results presented here will be useful for understanding the complex hydrodynamics, its interaction with chemical reactions and influence of different reactor scales on performance of the TBRs. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5512 / 5526
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ahmed T., 1989, HYDROCARBON PHASE BE
[2]   A two-fluid model for flow regime transition in gas-liquid trickle-bed reactors [J].
Attou, A ;
Ferschneider, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (21) :5031-5037
[3]   Science and technology of novel processes for deep desulfurization of oil refinery streams: A review [J].
Babich, IV ;
Moulijn, JA .
FUEL, 2003, 82 (06) :607-631
[4]   Three-phase reactor model to simulate the performance of pilot-plant and industrial trickle-bed reactors sustaining hydrotreating reactions [J].
Bhaskar, M ;
Valavarasu, G ;
Sairam, B ;
Balaraman, KS ;
Balu, K .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (21) :6654-6669
[5]   Trickle-bed reactor model for desulfurization and dearomatization of diesel [J].
Chowdhury, R ;
Pedernera, E ;
Reimert, R .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2002, 48 (01) :126-135
[6]   Liquid holdup in packed beds at low mass flux [J].
de Klerk, A .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2003, 49 (06) :1597-1600
[7]  
DUDUKOVIC MP, 2005, AICHE ANN M CINC OH
[8]   KINETIC MODELING AND REACTOR SIMULATION IN HYDRODESULFURIZATION OF OIL FRACTIONS [J].
FROMENT, GF ;
DEPAUW, GA ;
VANRYSSELBERGHE, V .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1994, 33 (12) :2975-2988
[9]   DESIGN OF LABORATORY HYDROTREATING REACTORS - SCALING DOWN OF TRICKLE-FLOW REACTORS [J].
GIERMAN, H .
APPLIED CATALYSIS, 1988, 43 (02) :277-286
[10]   TRICKLE-BED REACTOR PERFORMANCE .1. HOLDUP AND MASS-TRANSFER EFFECTS [J].
GOTO, S ;
SMITH, JM .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1975, 21 (04) :706-713