Neural activity during encoding predicts false memories created by misinformation

被引:102
作者
Okado, Y
Stark, CEL [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Neurosci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1101/lm.87605
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
False memories are often demonstrated using the misinformation paradigm, ill which a person's recollection of a witnessed event is altered after exposure to misinformation about the event. The neural basis of this phenomenon, however, remains unknown. We used fMRI to investigate encoding processes during the viewing of an event and misinformation to see whether neural activity during either encoding phase Could predict what would be remembered. fMRI data were collected as participants Studied eight vignettes (Original Event phase). Shortly afterward, participants Studied the same vignettes during scanning, but with changes to several details, serving as the misinformation (Misinformation phase). Two days later, their memories for the Original Event were assessed. Activity that Subsequently led to true and false memories was examined during both encoding phases. Two interaction patterns between encoding phase (Original Event and Misinformation) and type of memory (true and false) were observed in MTL and PFC regions. Ill the left hippocampus tail and perirhinal cortex, a predictive item-encoding pattern was observed. During the Original Event phase, activity was greater for true than false memories, whereas during the Misinformation phase, activity was greater for false than true memories. In other re.-ions, a pattern suggestive Of Source encoding was observed, in which activity for false memories was greater during the Original Event phase than the Misinformation phase. Together, these results Suggest that encoding processes play a critical role in determining true and false memory Outcome in misinformation paradigms.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Making memories: Brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered [J].
Brewer, JB ;
Zhao, Z ;
Desmond, JE ;
Glover, GH ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
SCIENCE, 1998, 281 (5380) :1185-1187
[2]   Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? [J].
Brown, MW ;
Aggleton, JP .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (01) :51-61
[3]   Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval II. Selective averaging of event-related fMRI trials to test the retrieval success hypothesis [J].
Buckner, RL ;
Koutstaal, W ;
Schacter, DL ;
Dale, AM ;
Rotte, M ;
Rosen, BR .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 7 (03) :163-175
[4]   The cognitive neuroscience of remembering [J].
Randy L. Buckner ;
Mark E. Wheeler .
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2001, 2 (9) :624-634
[5]   Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval using fMRI I. Retrieval effort versus retrieval success [J].
Buckner, RL ;
Koutstaal, W ;
Schacter, DL ;
Wagner, AD ;
Rosen, BR .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 7 (03) :151-162
[6]   Beyond HERA: Contributions of specific prefrontal brain areas to long-term memory retrieval [J].
Buckner, RL .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (02) :149-158
[7]   Encoding processes during retrieval tasks [J].
Buckner, RL ;
Wheeler, ME ;
Sheridan, MA .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (03) :406-415
[8]   Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory [J].
Cabeza, R ;
Rao, SM ;
Wagner, AD ;
Mayer, AR ;
Schacter, DL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (08) :4805-4810
[9]   Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies [J].
Cabeza, R ;
Nyberg, L .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (01) :1-47
[10]   AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages [J].
Cox, RW .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (03) :162-173