A person-centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology

被引:360
作者
Meyer, John P. [1 ]
Morin, Alexandre J. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychol, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Inst Posit Psychol & Educ, Strathfield, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
commitment; mindsets; targets; person centered; profiles; mixture models; LATENT PROFILE ANALYSIS; GROWTH MIXTURE-MODELS; COMMON METHOD BIAS; ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT; NORMATIVE COMMITMENT; VARIABLE MODELS; WORK; CONTINUANCE; PERFORMANCE; ASSUMPTIONS;
D O I
10.1002/job.2085
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There has been a recent increase in the application of person-centered research strategies in the investigation of workplace commitments. To date, research has focused primarily on the identification, within a population, of subgroups presenting different cross-sectional or longitudinal configurations of commitment mindsets (affective, normative, and continuance) and/or targets (e.g., organization, occupation, and supervisor), but other applications are possible. In an effort to promote a substantive methodological synergy, we begin by explaining why some aspects of commitment theory are best tested using a person-centered approach. We then summarize the results of existing research and suggest applications to other research questions. Next, we turn our attention to methodological issues, including strategies for identifying the best profile structure, testing for consistency across samples, time, culture, and so on, and incorporating other variables in the models to test theory regarding profile development, consequences, and change trajectories. We conclude with a discussion of the practical implications of taking a person-centered approach to the study of commitment as a complement to the more traditional variable-centered approach. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 612
页数:29
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LATENT GOLD 4 0
[2]  
Asparouhouv T., 2007, TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]   Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (04) :495-508
[4]   Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (04) :757-786
[5]   The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 9 (01) :3-29
[6]   Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (03) :338-363
[7]  
Becker T. E., 2009, COMMITMENT ORG ACCUM, P383
[8]   PROFILES OF COMMITMENT - AN EMPIRICAL-TEST [J].
BECKER, TE ;
BILLINGS, RS .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) :177-190
[9]  
BECKER TE, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P232, DOI 10.5465/256481
[10]   The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach [J].
Bentein, K ;
Vandenberg, R ;
Vandenberghe, C ;
Stinglhamber, F .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (03) :468-482