Experiences of bereaved family caregivers with shared decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a qualitative interview study

被引:22
作者
van Oosterhout, Sanne P. C. [1 ,2 ]
Ermers, Daisy J. M. [1 ]
Ploos van Amstel, Floor K. [3 ]
van Herpen, Carla M. L. [3 ]
Schoon, Yvonne [4 ]
Perry, Marieke [4 ,5 ,6 ]
van Geel, Maartje [7 ]
Kuip, Evelien J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Engels, Yvonne [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol Pain & Palliat Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept IQ Healthcare, Kapittelweg 54 160, NL-6525 EP Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Geriatr Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Alzheimer Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Proc Improvement & Innovat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Family caregivers; Palliative care; Shared decision making; Cancer; Bereavement; Communication; Qualitative research; Professional-family relations; CARE; PATIENT; INVOLVEMENT; CHALLENGES; ATTITUDES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-021-00833-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patients with incurable cancer face complex medical decisions. Their family caregivers play a prominent role in shared decision making processes, but we lack insights into their experiences. In this study, we explored how bereaved family caregivers experienced the shared decision making process. Methods We performed a qualitative interview study with in-depth interviews analysed with inductive content analysis. We used a purposive sample of bereaved family caregivers (n = 16) of patients with cancer treated in a tertiary university hospital in the Netherlands. Results Four themes were identified: 1. scenarios of decision making, 2. future death of the patient 3. factors influencing choices when making a treatment decision, and 4. preconditions for the decision making process. Most family caregivers deferred decisions to the patient or physician. Talking about the patient's future death was not preferred by all family caregivers. All family caregivers reported life prolongation as a significant motivator for treatment, while the quality of life was rarely mentioned. A respectful relationship, close involvement, and open communication with healthcare professionals in the palliative setting were valued by many interviewees. Family caregivers' experiences and needs seemed to be overlooked during medical encounters. Conclusions Family caregivers of deceased patients with cancer mentioned life prolongation, and not quality of life, as the most important treatment aim. They highly valued interactions with the medical oncologist and being involved in the conversations. We advise medical oncologists to take more effort to involve the family caregiver, and more explicitly address quality of life in the consultations.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures
    Redelmeier, DA
    Kahneman, D
    [J]. PAIN, 1996, 66 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [32] Resilience for family carers of advanced cancer patientshow can health care providers contribute? A qualitative interview study with carers
    Roen, Ingebrigt
    Stifoss-Hanssen, Hans
    Grande, Gunn
    Brenne, Anne-Tove
    Kaasa, Stein
    Sand, Kari
    Knudsen, Anne Kari
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (08) : 1410 - 1418
  • [33] Family perspectives on communication with healthcare providers during end-of-life cancer care
    Royak-Schaler, Renee
    Gadalla, Shahinaz M.
    Lemkau, Jeanne P.
    Ross, Douglas D.
    Alexander, Carla
    Scott, Deborah
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2006, 33 (04) : 753 - 760
  • [34] Attitudes Toward Family Involvement in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: The Perspectives of Patients, Family Caregivers, and Their Oncologists
    Shin, Dong Wook
    Cho, Juhee
    Roter, Debra L.
    Kim, So Young
    Yang, Hyung Kook
    Park, Keeho
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Hee-Young
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Park, Jong Hyock
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (06) : 770 - 778
  • [35] Strauss A., 1998, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
  • [36] Silent voices: Family caregivers' narratives of involvement in palliative care
    Tarberg, Anett Skorpen
    Kvangarsnes, Marit
    Hole, Torstein
    Thronaes, Morten
    Madssen, Torfinn Stove
    Landstad, Bodil J.
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2019, 6 (04): : 1446 - 1454
  • [37] Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
    Tong, Allison
    Sainsbury, Peter
    Craig, Jonathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 19 (06) : 349 - 357
  • [38] Expert and patient consensus on a dynamic model for shared decision-making in frail older patients
    van de Pol, Marjolein H. J.
    Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G.
    Lagro, Joep
    Slaats, Yvonne H. P.
    Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde
    Lagro-Janssen, Antoine L. M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (06) : 1069 - 1077
  • [39] What Matters Most for the Dutch Public in Palliative Care: A Survey
    van der Velden, Annette
    Engels, Yvonne
    Nanninga, Marieke
    Francke, Anneke
    Fritsma, Jolanda
    Boddaert, Manon
    Krabbe, Paul
    van der Heide, Agnes
    Reyners, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (06) : E107 - E107
  • [40] Advance care planning conversations with palliative patients: looking through the GP's eyes
    Wichmann, Anne B.
    van Dam, Hanna
    Thoonsen, Bregje
    Boer, Theo A.
    Engels, Yvonne
    Groenewoud, A. Stef
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19