Dynamic simulation of different transport options of renewable hydrogen to a refinery in a coupled energy system approach

被引:14
作者
Andresen, Lisa [1 ]
Bode, Carsten [1 ]
Schmitz, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Engn Thermodynam, Denickestr 17, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Power-to-gas; Hydrogen substitution in a refinery; Transportation infrastructure; Production cost; CO2; emission; Dynamic simulation; POWER-TO-GAS; STORAGE; METHANATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.111
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Three alternative transport options for hydrogen generated from excess renewable power to a refinery of different scales are compared to the reference case by means of hydrogen production cost, overall efficiency, and CO2 emissions. The hydrogen is transported by a) the natural gas grid and reclaimed by the existing steam reformer, b) an own pipeline and c) hydrogen trailers. The analysis is applied to the city of Hamburg, Germany, for two scenarios of installed renewable energy capacities. The annual course of excess renewable power is modeled in a coupled system approach and the replaceable hydrogen mass flow rate is determined using measurement data from an existing refinery. Dynamic simulations are performed using an open-source Modelica (R) library. It is found that in all three alternative hydrogen supply chains CO2 emissions can be reduced and costs are increased compared to the reference case. Transporting hydrogen via the natural gas grid is the least efficient but achieves the highest emission reduction and is the most economical alternative for small to medium amounts of hydrogen. Using a hydrogen pipeline is the most efficient option and slightly cheaper for large amounts than employing the natural gas grid. Transporting hydrogen by trailers is not economical for single consumers and realizes the lowest CO2 reductions. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:19600 / 19614
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Presenting the implementation of power-to-gas to an oil refinery as a way to reduce carbon intensity of petroleum fuels [J].
Al-Subaie, Abdullah. ;
Maroufmashat, Azadeh ;
Elkamel, Ali ;
Fowler, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (30) :19376-19388
[2]  
Altmann M, 2001, Wasserstofferzeugung in offshore Windparks: killerKriterien, grobe Auslegung und Kostenabschatzung
[3]  
Andresen L., 2015, P 11 INT MOD C VERS, P695, DOI [10.3384/ecp15118695, DOI 10.3384/ECP15118695]
[4]  
Andresen L., 2016, GWF GAS ENERG, V9, P682
[5]  
Andresen L, 2017, TRANSIENTES VERHALTE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Entwicklung der Energiemarkte - Energiereferenzprognose
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, UN INN EN STOR HANSE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, VDI 2067 EC EFF BUIL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Die Zukunftigen Kosten Strombasierter Synthetischer Brennstoffe: Schlussfolgerungen aus Sicht von Agora Verkehrswende und Agora Energiewende
[10]   Hydrogen production via solid electrolytic routes [J].
Badwal, Sukhvinder P. S. ;
Giddey, Sarbjit ;
Munnings, Christopher .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 2 (05) :473-487