A comparison of Latin hypercube and grid ensemble designs for the multivariate emulation of an Earth system model

被引:42
作者
Urban, Nathan M. [1 ]
Fricker, Thomas E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Geosci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Probabil & Stat, Sheffield S3 7RH, S Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Climate model; Statistical emulator; Design of computer experiments; Ensemble; Latin hypercube; Kriging; CLIMATE; SENSITIVITY; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2009.11.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A statistical emulator is a fast proxy for a complex computer model which predicts model output at arbitrary parameter settings from a limited ensemble of training data. Regular grid designs for the training set are commonly used for their simplicity. However, Latin hypercube designs have well known theoretical advantages in the design of computer experiments, especially as the dimension of the parameter space grows. Here we use time series output from a simple Earth system model to compare the influence of these two design choices on the cross-validation prediction skill of a statistical emulator. We find that an emulator trained on a Latin hypercube design shows a small but clear improvement in prediction quality relative to an emulator trained on a grid design. We also find that the Latin hypercube emulator is more accurate than the grid emulator in single-parameter model sensitivity studies. We conclude with a discussion of ensemble design choices for emulator computer experiments. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 755
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, USSR COMP MATH MATH, V16, P236, DOI DOI 10.1016/0041-5553(76)90154-3
[3]  
Banerjee S., 2003, Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data
[4]   Earth system models of intermediate complexity: closing the gap in the spectrum of climate system models [J].
Claussen, M ;
Mysak, LA ;
Weaver, AJ ;
Crucifix, M ;
Fichefet, T ;
Loutre, MF ;
Weber, SL ;
Alcamo, J ;
Alexeev, VA ;
Berger, A ;
Calov, R ;
Ganopolski, A ;
Goosse, H ;
Lohmann, G ;
Lunkeit, F ;
Mokhov, II ;
Petoukhov, V ;
Stone, P ;
Wang, Z .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2002, 18 (07) :579-586
[5]  
CONTI S, 2007, 56907 U SHEFF DEP PR
[6]  
Cressie N., 1993, Statistics for Spatial Data, DOI [10.1002/9781119115151, DOI 10.1002/9781119115151]
[7]   Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change [J].
Davidson, EA ;
Janssens, IA .
NATURE, 2006, 440 (7081) :165-173
[8]   CLIMATE RESPONSE-TIMES - DEPENDENCE ON CLIMATE SENSITIVITY AND OCEAN MIXING [J].
HANSEN, J ;
RUSSELL, G ;
LACIS, A ;
FUNG, I ;
RIND, D ;
STONE, P .
SCIENCE, 1985, 229 (4716) :857-859
[9]   A nonlinear impulse response model of the coupled carbon cycle-climate system (NICCS) [J].
Hooss, G ;
Voss, R ;
Hasselmann, K ;
Maier-Reimer, E ;
Joos, F .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2001, 18 (3-4) :189-202
[10]  
HUSSLAGE B, 2008, 2008104 TILB U CTR E