Knowledge exchange in the Pacific: The TROPIC (Translational Research into Obesity Prevention Policies for Communities) project

被引:15
作者
Mavoa, Helen [1 ]
Waqa, Gade [2 ]
Moodie, Marj
Kremer, Peter [3 ]
McCabe, Marita [4 ]
Snowdon, Wendy [1 ,2 ]
Swinburn, Boyd [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, WHO Collaborating Ctr Obes Prevent, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Fiji Natl Univ, Coll Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Fiji Sch Med, Suva, Fiji
[3] Univ Melbourne, McCaughey Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[5] Univ Auckland, Sch Populat Hlth, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
Policy; Obesity; Knowledge exchange; Knowledge broker; Pacific; EVIDENCE-INFORMED POLICY; HEALTH-POLICY; FIJI; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE; ORGANIZATIONS; INTERVENTIONS; DETERMINANTS; ADOLESCENTS; PROMOTE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-12-552
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Policies targeting obesogenic environments and behaviours are critical to counter rising obesity rates and lifestyle-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Policies are likely to be most effective and enduring when they are based on the best available evidence. Evidence-informed policy making is especially challenging in countries with limited resources. The Pacific TROPIC (Translational Research for Obesity Prevention in Communities) project aims to implement and evaluate a tailored knowledge-brokering approach to evidence-informed policy making to address obesity in Fiji, a Pacific nation challenged by increasingly high rates of obesity and concomitant NCDs. Methods: The TROPIC project draws on the concept of 'knowledge exchange' between policy developers (individuals; organisations) and researchers to deliver a knowledge broking programme that maps policy environments, conducts workshops on evidence-informed policy making, supports the development of evidence-informed policy briefs, and embeds evidence-informed policy making into organisational culture. Recruitment of government and nongovernment organisational representatives will be based on potential to: develop policies relevant to obesity, reach broad audiences, and commit to resourcing staff and building a culture that supports evidence-informed policy development. Workshops will increase awareness of both obesity and policy cycles, as well as develop participants' skills in accessing, assessing and applying relevant evidence to policy briefs. The knowledge-broking team will then support participants to: 1) develop evidence-informed policy briefs that are both commensurate with national and organisational plans and also informed by evidence from the Pacific Obesity Prevention in Communities project and elsewhere; and 2) collaborate with participating organisations to embed evidence-informed policy making structures and processes. This knowledge broking initiative will be evaluated via data from semi-structured interviews, a validated self-assessment tool, process diaries and outputs. Discussion: Public health interventions have rarely targeted evidence-informed policy making structures and processes to reduce obesity and NCDs. This study will empirically advance understanding of knowledge broking processes to extend evidence-informed policy making skills and develop a suite of national obesity-related policies that can potentially improve population health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Towards translation of environmental determinants of physical activity in children into multi-sector policy measures: study design of a Dutch project [J].
Aarts, Marie-Jeanne ;
van de Goor, Ien A. M. ;
van Oers, Hans A. M. ;
Schuit, Albertine J. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9
[2]  
[Anonymous], NONC DIS NCD PREV CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], HEALTHCARE POLICY
[4]   Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence [J].
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Doyle, Jodie ;
Lamb, Chris ;
Waters, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 28 (02) :168-172
[5]   Bridging the Know-Do Gap': a role for health information professionals? [J].
Booth, Andrew .
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2011, 28 (04) :331-334
[6]   Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: A framework for action [J].
Bowen, S ;
Zwi, AB .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (07) :600-605
[7]  
Bowen Sarah, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P203, DOI 10.1258/135581905774414213
[8]   Researchers and policymakers - Travelers in parallel universes [J].
Brownson, RC ;
Royer, C ;
Ewing, R ;
McBride, TD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 30 (02) :164-172
[9]   Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy [J].
Campbell, Danielle ;
Donald, Braedon ;
Moore, Gabriel ;
Frew, Deborah .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2011, 7 (01) :97-107
[10]  
Canadian Health Research Foundation, 2009, IS RES WORK YOU SELF