Erroneous Computer Electrocardiogram Interpretation of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Clinical Consequences

被引:40
作者
Bae, Myung Hwan [1 ]
Lee, Jang Hoon [1 ]
Yang, Dong Heon [1 ]
Park, Hun Sik [1 ]
Cho, Yongkeun [1 ]
Chae, Shung Chull [1 ]
Jun, Jae-Eun [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taegu 700721, South Korea
关键词
ERRORS;
D O I
10.1002/clc.22000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and nature of errors made by computer electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis of atrial fibrillation (AF), and the clinical consequences. Hypothesis: Computer software for interpreting ECGs has advanced. Methods: A total of 10279 ECGs were collected, automatically interpreted by the built-in ECG software, and then reread by 2 cardiologists. AF-related ECGs were classified into 3 groups: overinterpreted AF (rhythms other than AF interpreted as AF), misinterpreted AF (AF interpreted as rhythms other than AF), and true AF (AF interpreted as AF by both computer ECG interpretation and cardiologists). Results: There were 1057 AF-related ECGs from 409 patients. Among these, 840 ECGs (79.5%) were true AF. Overinterpretation occurred in 98 (9.3%) cases. Sinus rhythm and sinus tachycardia with premature atrial contraction and/or baseline artifact and sinus arrhythmia were commonly overinterpreted as AF. Heart rate =60 bpm and baseline artifact significantly increased the likelihood of overinterpreted AF. Misdiagnosis occurred in 119 (11.3%) cases, in which AF was usually misdiagnosed as sinus or supraventricular tachycardia. The presence of tachycardia and low-amplitude atrial activity significantly increased the likelihood of misdiagnosis of AF. Among the erroneous computer ECG interpretations, 17 cases (7.8%) were not corrected by the ordering physicians and/or repeat computer-ECG interpretation; inappropriate follow-up studies or treatments of the patients were undertaken with no serious sequelae. Conclusions: Erroneous computer ECG interpretation of AF was not rare. Attention should be concentrated on educating physicians about ECG appearance and confounding factors of AF, along with ongoing quality control of built-in software for automatic ECG interpretation. Clin. Cardiol. 2012 DOI: 10.1002/clc.22000 The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 353
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis [J].
Anh, Daejoon ;
Krishnan, Subramaniam ;
Bogun, Frank .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2006, 39 (03) :343-345
[2]   Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences [J].
Bogun, F ;
Anh, D ;
Kalahasty, G ;
Wissner, E ;
Serhal, CB ;
Bazzi, R ;
Weaver, WD ;
Schuger, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 117 (09) :636-642
[3]   Causes of errors in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrial fibrillation by physicians [J].
Davidenko, Jorge Mario ;
Snyder, Lisa Simonetta .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2007, 40 (05) :450-456
[4]   PREVALENCE, AGE DISTRIBUTION, AND GENDER OF PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION - ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
FEINBERG, WM ;
BLACKSHEAR, JL ;
LAUPACIS, A ;
KRONMAL, R ;
HART, RG .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (05) :469-473
[5]   Oral anticoagulation for ECG tremor artefact simulating atrial fibrillation [J].
Finsterer, J ;
Stöllberger, C ;
Gatterer, E .
ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2003, 58 (05) :425-429
[6]   2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Updates Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society [J].
Fuster, Valentin ;
Ryden, Lars E. ;
Cannom, Davis S. ;
Crijns, Harry J. ;
Curtis, Anne B. ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ;
Halperin, Jonathan L. ;
Kay, G. Neal ;
Le Huezey, Jean-Yves ;
Lowe, James E. ;
Olsson, S. Bertil ;
Prystowsky, Eric N. ;
Tamargo, Juan Luis ;
Wann, L. Samuel ;
Estes, N. A. Mark, III ;
Ezekowitz, Michael D. ;
Jackman, Warren M. ;
January, Craig T. ;
Page, Richard L. ;
Slotwiner, David J. ;
Stevenson, William G. ;
Tracy, Cynthia M. ;
Jacobs, Alice K. ;
Anderson, Jeffrey L. ;
Albert, Nancy ;
Buller, Christopher E. ;
Creager, Mark A. ;
Ettinger, Steven M. ;
Guyton, Robert A. ;
Hochman, Judith S. ;
Kushner, Frederick G. ;
Ohman, Erik Magnus ;
Tarkington, Lynn G. ;
Yancy, Clyde W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (11) :E101-E198
[7]  
GAJEWSKI J, 1981, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V245, P1540
[8]   Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation [J].
Guglin, ME ;
Thatai, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 106 (02) :232-237
[9]  
Leithauser Boris, 2009, Korean Circ J, V39, P443, DOI 10.4070/kcj.2009.39.11.443
[10]  
Margolis SA, 2001, FAM MED, V33, P447