SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
|
2011年
/
25卷
/
07期
关键词:
Single port;
Laparoscopy;
Total proctocolectomy;
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis;
RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY;
COLORECTAL SURGERY;
LEFT COLECTOMY;
ACCESS;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
COMPLICATIONS;
SIGMOIDECTOMY;
COLON;
D O I:
10.1007/s00464-010-1518-8
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) has been used in urologic, gynecologic, general, and colorectal surgery. We herein report our experience with the use of SPLS for total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP/IPAA). Methods All patients who underwent a RP/IPAA using SPLS between June and September 2009 were identified from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic database. All procedures were performed with the use of a 5-mm Olympus EndoEye (TM) and traditional laparoscopic instruments via a SILS (TM) port placed at the planned ileostomy site. Results There were five patients (3 male) included in the study. Median age was 43 years (range = 13-47 years). Median body mass index was 20.66 kg/m(2) (range = 14.63-25.97 kg/m(2)). Diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (n = 4) and familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 1). Median ASA score was 2 (range = 1-3). Median operative time was 153 min (range = 132-278 min). Median estimated blood loss was 100 ml (range = 50-200 ml). There were no conversions to either a conventional laparoscopic or an open procedure. Median time to return of bowel function was 2 days. Median length of stay was 4 days (range = 3-6 days). Postoperative complications included two patients with partial small-bowel obstructions. Both resolved with conservative management. All patients had their ileostomies closed. Conclusion RP/IPAA using SPLS is a safe technique. Additional studies are needed to compare SPLS to conventional laparoscopy and open surgery with respect to operative times, convalescence, and outcomes.