Sustainability indicator development-Science or political negotiation?

被引:191
作者
Rametsteiner, Ewald [1 ]
Puelzl, Helga [2 ]
Alkan-Olsson, Johanna [3 ]
Frederiksen, Pia [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bodenkultur Wien, Dept Econ & Social Sci, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Salzburg Univ, Dept Polit Sci & Sociol, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[3] LUCSUS, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Aarhus, Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Policy Anal, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Science policy interface; Sustainable development; Sustainability impact assessment; Indicator selection; SELECTING ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; POLICY; GOVERNANCE; FRAMEWORK; INTERFACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.009
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The efforts to develop sustainability indicators have strongly increased since the beginning of the 1990s, often led by intergovernmental processes. More recently, a number of sustainability indicator development processes have been initiated within large research projects that aim to design tools for sustainability assessments, funded by the European Union. The development of sustainability indicators provides a particular challenge to scientists, given the essentially normative dimension of the concept: of "sustainability". Thus, we argue, the development of sustainability indicators is a process of both scientific "knowledge production" and of political "norm creation", and both components need to be properly acknowledged. Based on a respective theoretical framework and comparing five cases of sustainability indicator development processes (three science-led and two led by intergovernmental processes), we find that the political norm creation dimension is not fully and explicitly recognized in science-led processes. The paper concludes by discussing a number of implications for the design of sustainability indicator development processes, in particular with regard to participation and representation as well as adjustment of indicators over time. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Statement of Forest Principles
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, ENV QUALITY INDICES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 12005 EEA
[4]  
[Anonymous], WISSEN AN DER BORSE
[5]  
[Anonymous], STATES KNOWLEDGE COP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Social Construction of What?
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 041 MPIFG
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COMMON GOODS REINVEN
[10]  
[Anonymous], EUR INTEGR ONLINE PA