Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design

被引:28
作者
Montolio, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Taberner, Pere A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Econ, Av Diagonal 690, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Inst dEcon Barcelona IEB, C John M Keynes 1-11, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[3] Knowlegde Sharing Network KSNET, C Mallorca 100, Barcelona 08029, Spain
关键词
Gender differences; Stakes; Pressure; Academic performance; Higher education; Field data; TEST ANXIETY; MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT; TEST-SCORES; GAP; STUDENTS; COMPETITION; COLLEGE; TRANSMISSION; PREDICTORS; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2021.09.021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Student performance at university is a strong determinant of individual decisions and future outcomes, most notably labour opportunities. Although published studies have found gender differences in student performance in response to pressure, little is known about such differences when university students respond to different levels of pressure, resulting from different stakes. Based on field data, this study aims to examine gender differences in student performance in response to different stakes when sitting multiple choice tests, a frequently employed exam format at university. To do so, the introduction of continuous assessment in the evaluation system of a university course allows us to exploit a unique quasi-experimental set up in which the same students take similar tests throughout the course but under different levels of pressure, i.e. facing different stakes. Exploiting individual student data in a panel data framework, we find that male students outperform their female counterparts when under high pressure. However, as the stakes faced decrease, the gender gap shrinks and even reverses in favour of female students at the lowest pressure scenario. We also analyse possible mechanisms responsible for the observed gender gap by studying whether students excel or choke under pressure depending on their gender, and by studying gender differences when omitting questions on multiple choice tests. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1090
页数:26
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Akyol P., 2016, 22401 NBER, DOI [10.3386/w22401, DOI 10.3386/W22401]
[2]  
Arenas A., 2020, GENDER DIFFERE UNPUB
[3]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO BIG STAKES [J].
Azmat, Ghazala ;
Calsamiglia, Caterina ;
Iriberri, Nagore .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2016, 14 (06) :1372-1400
[4]  
Backovic DV, 2012, PSYCHIAT DANUB, V24, P175
[5]  
Balart P., 2020, SSRN ELECT J, P36, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3556710, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3556710]
[6]   Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess [J].
Baldiga, Katherine .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (02) :434-448
[8]  
Beilock S., 2011, Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to
[9]   The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations [J].
Blau, Francine D. ;
Kahn, Lawrence M. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2017, 55 (03) :789-865
[10]   Weighting recent performance to improve college and labor market outcomes [J].
Bulman, George .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 146 :97-108