Long-Term Outcome of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer Undergoing Standard Resection and Local Excision

被引:25
作者
Peng, Junjie [1 ]
Chen, Wei [2 ]
Venook, Alan P. [3 ]
Sheng, Weiqi [4 ]
Xu, Ye [1 ]
Guan, Zuqing [1 ]
Cai, Guoxiang [1 ]
Cai, Sanjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Dept Oncol,Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Anterior resection; Abdominoperineal resection; Local recurrence; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; TRANSANAL EXCISION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; CURATIVE RESECTION; T1; CARCINOMA; THERAPY; RECURRENCE; SELECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3816/CCC.2011.n.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To explore the long-term outcome and prognostic factors for early stage rectal cancer patients undergoing standard resection (SR) or local excision (LE). Patients and Methods: This study included 350 patients with stage I rectal cancer, in which 283 cases (80.9%) received SR, and 67 cases (19.1%) received LE. Survival analyses were performed to compare outcomes of different surgeries. Results: The 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate was 14.1% in LE group versus 3.3% in SR group (P = .0004), and the 10-year overall survival (OS) rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis suggested that LE was an independent risk factor for 5-year LR rate and 10-year OS rate. Tumor grade was found related to 5-year LR, and T stage was found related to 10-year OS. Tumor size of 2.5 cm is found as a possible cut-off for predicting 5-year LR rate in LE group, with a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 75.9%. In patients with LE, the 5-year LR rate for tumors >= 2.5 cm was 40%, compared with 4.3% for tumors < 2.5 cm (P = .001). Conclusion: Local excision in early-stage rectal cancer may result in high local recurrence rate. The procedure is only recommended in highly selective groups of patients. A tumor size of 2.5 cm is a useful criterion for choosing LE rather than SR.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Gender differences in quality of life of patients with rectal cancer.: A five-year prospective study [J].
Schmidt, CE ;
Bestmann, B ;
Küchler, T ;
Longo, WE ;
Rohde, V ;
Kremer, B .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 29 (12) :1630-1641
[22]   How important is rigid proctosigmoidoscopy in localizing rectal cancer? [J].
Schoellhammer, Hans F. ;
Gregorian, Armen C. ;
Sarkisyan, Grant G. ;
Petrie, Beverley A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 196 (06) :904-908
[23]   Local excision of rectal cancer - What is the evidence? [J].
Sengupta, S ;
Tjandra, JJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (09) :1345-1361
[24]  
*SHANGH MUN CDCP, SHANGH CANC REP 2007
[25]   Curative resection for stage I rectal cancer: Natural history, prognostic factors, and recurrence patterns [J].
Sticca, RP ;
RodriguezBigas, M ;
Penetrante, RB ;
Petrelli, NJ .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1996, 14 (05) :491-497
[26]   Transanal local excision of selected low rectal cancers [J].
Taylor, RH ;
Hay, JH ;
Larsson, SN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (05) :360-363
[27]   LOCAL EXCISION OF RECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
THALER, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (06) :751-752
[28]  
Troisi RJ, 1999, CANCER, V85, P1670, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990415)85:8<1670::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO
[29]  
2-M
[30]  
WILLETT CG, 1994, CANCER, V73, P2716, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2716::AID-CNCR2820731111>3.0.CO