Long-Term Outcome of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer Undergoing Standard Resection and Local Excision

被引:25
作者
Peng, Junjie [1 ]
Chen, Wei [2 ]
Venook, Alan P. [3 ]
Sheng, Weiqi [4 ]
Xu, Ye [1 ]
Guan, Zuqing [1 ]
Cai, Guoxiang [1 ]
Cai, Sanjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Dept Oncol,Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Anterior resection; Abdominoperineal resection; Local recurrence; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; TRANSANAL EXCISION; ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; CURATIVE RESECTION; T1; CARCINOMA; THERAPY; RECURRENCE; SELECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3816/CCC.2011.n.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To explore the long-term outcome and prognostic factors for early stage rectal cancer patients undergoing standard resection (SR) or local excision (LE). Patients and Methods: This study included 350 patients with stage I rectal cancer, in which 283 cases (80.9%) received SR, and 67 cases (19.1%) received LE. Survival analyses were performed to compare outcomes of different surgeries. Results: The 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate was 14.1% in LE group versus 3.3% in SR group (P = .0004), and the 10-year overall survival (OS) rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis suggested that LE was an independent risk factor for 5-year LR rate and 10-year OS rate. Tumor grade was found related to 5-year LR, and T stage was found related to 10-year OS. Tumor size of 2.5 cm is found as a possible cut-off for predicting 5-year LR rate in LE group, with a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 75.9%. In patients with LE, the 5-year LR rate for tumors >= 2.5 cm was 40%, compared with 4.3% for tumors < 2.5 cm (P = .001). Conclusion: Local excision in early-stage rectal cancer may result in high local recurrence rate. The procedure is only recommended in highly selective groups of patients. A tumor size of 2.5 cm is a useful criterion for choosing LE rather than SR.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum - Transanal excision or radical surgery?
    Bentrem, DJ
    Okabe, S
    Wong, WD
    Guillem, JG
    Weiser, MR
    Temple, LK
    Ben-Porat, LS
    Minsky, BD
    Cohen, AM
    Paty, PB
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (04) : 472 - 479
  • [2] Stage I rectal cancer: Identification of high-risk patients - Reply
    Blumberg, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) : 580 - 580
  • [3] Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer
    Endreseth, BH
    Myrvold, HE
    Romundstad, P
    Hestvik, UE
    Bjerkeset, T
    Wibe, A
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (07) : 1380 - 1388
  • [4] ENKER WE, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P1396
  • [5] Enker WE, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P1402
  • [6] Goldstein NS, 1999, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V111, P51
  • [7] Havenga K, 1996, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V182, P495
  • [8] Rectal cancer - The Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997
    Heald, RJ
    Moran, BJ
    Ryall, RDH
    Sexton, R
    MacFarlane, JK
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (08) : 894 - 898
  • [9] LOCAL EXCISION OF CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM - INDICATIONS
    KILLINGBACK, M
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 16 (03) : 437 - 446
  • [10] Lee WH, 2003, FASEB J, V17, pA352