Layer thickness and the shape of faults

被引:34
作者
Benedicto, A
Schultz, RA
Soliva, R
机构
[1] Univ Paris 11, Dept Sci Terre, F-91405 Orsay, France
[2] Univ Nevada, Mackay Sch Mines, Dept Geol Sci, Geomech Rock Fracture Grp, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2003GL018237
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
[1] We analyze from a conceptual point of view, the role of layer thickness on fault vertical restriction, size distribution and shape evolution. We propose a model of fault growth from an initially circular/elliptical shape of individual ( but kinematically interrelated in a coherent fault zone) fault segments to a final rectangular shape. Faults ( or fault segments) that do not interact strongly with the stratigraphy grow vertically as nonrestricted with circular to elliptical shapes. Linkage of those faults leads to elliptical shapes for large composite faults. In contrast, faults ( or fault segments) whose vertical growth is restricted by the layer thickness evolve from circular to elliptical with progressively larger aspect ratios. In a sequence with heterogeneous strength and varying layer thickness, individual faults within each layer are restricted, producing a complex irregular tipline for the aggregate large fault. The irregular geometry will persist as long as the tendency for horizontal fault growth exceeds that for linkage; once linkage across layers occurs, then more regular elliptical tiplines will evolve. Because longer faults have larger displacements, then for brittle strain to be equal in layers of different thickness, more faults are needed in thin layers for the total displacements, and thus the strains, to balance. As a result, irregular fault shapes can evolve as more new faults grow in thinner layers into more rectangular shapes.
引用
收藏
页码:SDE13 / 1
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The geometric and statistical evolution of normal fault systems: an experimental study of the effects of mechanical layer thickness on scaling laws [J].
Ackermann, RV ;
Schlische, RW ;
Withjack, MO .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 2001, 23 (11) :1803-1819
[2]  
BARNETT JAM, 1987, AAPG BULL, V71, P925
[3]   DETERMINING ROCK MASS DEFORMABILITY - EXPERIENCE FROM CASE HISTORIES [J].
BIENIAWSKI, ZT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1978, 15 (05) :237-247
[4]   FAULT OVERLAP ZONES WITHIN DEVELOPING NORMAL-FAULT SYSTEMS [J].
CHILDS, C ;
WATTERSON, J ;
WALSH, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 152 :535-549
[5]   Fracture termination and step-over at bedding interfaces due to frictional slip and interface opening [J].
Cooke, ML ;
Underwood, CA .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 2001, 23 (2-3) :223-238
[6]   DISPLACEMENT LENGTH SCALING RELATIONSHIP FOR FAULTS - DATA SYNTHESIS AND DISCUSSION [J].
COWIE, PA ;
SCHOLZ, CH .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 1992, 14 (10) :1149-1156
[7]   FAULT STRAIN AND SEISMIC COUPLING ON MIDOCEAN RIDGES [J].
COWIE, PA ;
SCHOLZ, CH ;
EDWARDS, M ;
MALINVERNO, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1993, 98 (B10) :17911-17920
[8]   Implications of fault array evolution for synrift depocentre development: insights from a numerical fault growth model [J].
Cowie, PA ;
Gupta, S ;
Dawers, NH .
BASIN RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (3-4) :241-261
[9]   Fault Linkage: Three-dimensional mechanical interaction between echelon normal faults [J].
Crider, JG ;
Pollard, DD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1998, 103 (B10) :24373-24391
[10]   Influence of mechanical stratigraphy and kinematics on fault scaling relations [J].
Gross, MR ;
GutierrezAlonso, G ;
Bai, TX ;
Wacker, MA ;
Collinsworth, KB ;
Behl, RJ .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 1997, 19 (02) :171-183