Hepatitis B vaccines:: Assessment of the seroprotective efficacy of two recombinant DNA vaccines

被引:124
作者
Coates, T
Wilson, R
Patrick, G
André, F
Watson, V
机构
[1] Omnicare Clin Res United Kingdom, Dept Clin Writing, Chippenham, Wilts, England
[2] Omnicare Clin Res United Kingdom, Dept Med Affairs, Chippenham, Wilts, England
[3] Omnicare Clin Res United Kingdom, Dept Biometr, Chippenham, Wilts, England
[4] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
[5] GlaxoSmithKlin Biol SA, B-1330 Rixensart, Belgium
关键词
hepatitis B vaccine; clinical study review; vaccination program; seroprotection or seroprotective response rates; standards; analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80044-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: In universal vaccination programs, when there is no postvaccination serologic assessment of response, there must be confidence that the vaccines used provide a high degree of seroprotection. Objective: This parallel analysis of 2 recombinant hepatitis B vaccines (Engerix B (R) and Recombivax (R) /HB-Vax II (R)) was conducted to review the seroprotective efficacy of each vaccine in defined populations. Methods: Clinical studies of the 2 vaccines published as manuscripts or conference abstracts in the public domain between January 1986 and April 1999 were identified retrospectively by unrestricted screening of journals through BIOSIS (R), MEDLINE (R), and EMBASE (R) and the Internet. Unpublished or internal company data were excluded to maintain impartiality. The studies were reviewed and analyzed. The studies were not assessed for quality other than a judgment of their eligibility for inclusion in the analysis. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects in defined populations who showed an early seroprotective response to currently licensed vaccination schedules. Summary statistical analyses of seroprotective response rates and 95% CIs were calculated for each vaccine for each population. Seroprotective response was defined by an anti-hepatitis B surface antigen titer greater than or equal to 10 IU/L measured between I and 3 months after the final vaccination. Because the study was designed specifically to review published immunogenicity data, safety data were not assessed. The study was not designed to demonstrate superiority of one vaccine over the other. Results: A total of 181 clinical studies representing 32,904 vaccinated subjects were reviewed and analyzed, of whom 24,277 had been vaccinated with Engerix B and 8627 vaccinated with Recombivax/ MB-Var II. Seroprotection was achieved in 20,060 subjects (95.8%) with Engerix B and in 7774 subjects (94.3%) with Recombivax/HB-Vax II in the normal population vaccinated according to currently licensed 3-dose schedules. In a subgroup analysis, response rates in health care workers were 6492 subjects (94.5%) for Engerix B and 3245 subjects (92.2%) for Recombivax/HB-Vax II. Children and adolescents(1-19 years) showed the highest response rates to vaccination (4612 [98.6%], Engerix B: 2292 [98.9%], Recombivax/HB-Vax II). A total of 2875 infants (<1 year) (95.8%) achieved seroprotection with Engerix B. 701 (88.5%) achieved seroprotection with Recombivax/ MB-Var II. Conclusions: Hepatitis B vaccination programs using either Engerix B or Recombivax/HB-Vax II can achieve high seroprotective response rates, particularly in childhood and adolescence. Ideally, younger populations should be a primary target in current universal vaccination programs.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 403
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] One arm or two? Concurrent administration of meningococcal C conjugate and hepatitis B vaccines in pre-teens
    Pielak, Karen L.
    McIntyre, Cheryl C.
    Remple, Valencia P.
    Buxton, Jane A.
    Skowronski, Dariuta M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2008, 99 (01): : 52 - 56
  • [22] One Arm or Two? Concurrent Administration of Meningococcal C Conjugate and Hepatitis B Vaccines in Pre-teens
    Karen L. Pielak
    Cheryl C. McIntyre
    Valencia P. Remple
    Jane A. Buxton
    Danuta M. Skowronski
    Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2008, 99 : 52 - 56
  • [23] Major adverse reactions to yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccines - a review
    Grotto, I
    Mandel, Y
    Ephros, M
    Ashkenazi, I
    Shemer, J
    VACCINE, 1998, 16 (04) : 329 - 334
  • [24] Reactions to Hepatitis B vaccines in children: results of a study of 4 cases.
    Bakonde, VB
    Ponvert, C
    Le Clainche, L
    Brunet, D
    Scheinmann, P
    Paupe, J
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 1998, 38 (04): : 315 - 318
  • [25] Timing of Zero Dose of OPV, First Dose of Hepatitis B and BCG Vaccines
    Kuruvilla, Thomas A.
    Bridgitte, Akila
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2009, 46 (11) : 1013 - 1015
  • [26] Eosinophilic myocarditis temporally associated with conjugate meningococcal C and hepatitis B vaccines in children
    Barton, Michelle
    Finkelstein, Yaron
    Opavsky, Mary Anne
    Ito, Shinya
    Ho, Tommy
    Ford-Jones, Lee E.
    Taylor, Glenn
    Benson, Lee
    Gold, Ronald
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (09) : 831 - 835
  • [27] Safety of hepatitis B, pneumococcal polysaccharide and meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines in pregnancy: A systematic review
    Marinos C. Makris
    Konstantinos A. Polyzos
    Michael N. Mavros
    Stavros Athanasiou
    Petros I. Rafailidis
    Matthew E. Falagas
    Drug Safety, 2012, 35 (1) : 1 - 14
  • [28] Safety of Hepatitis B Vaccines (Monovalent or as Part of Combination) in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review
    Tee, Qiao Wen
    Odisho, Ramin
    Purcell, Elisha
    Purcell, Rachael
    Buttery, Jim
    Nold-Petry, Claudia A.
    Nold, Marcel F.
    Malhotra, Atul
    VACCINES, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [29] Combined vaccination by measles and hepatitis B vaccines:: A new cause of Gianotti-Crosti syndrome
    Andiran, N
    Sentürk, GB
    Bükülmez, G
    DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 204 (01) : 75 - 76
  • [30] Pain Response in Newborns to the Order of Injecting BCG and Hepatitis-B Vaccines: A Randomized Trial
    S. R. Ravikiran
    P. M. Jagadeesh Kumar
    Anand D. Meundi
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2011, 78 : 693 - 697