Identifying Priorities for Faculty Development in General Surgery Using the Delphi Consensus Method

被引:11
作者
Deal, Shanley B. [1 ]
Alseidi, Adnan A. [1 ]
Chipman, Jeffrey G. [2 ]
Gauvin, Jeffrey [3 ]
Meara, Michael [4 ]
Sidwell, Richard [5 ]
Stefanidis, Dimitrios [6 ]
Schenarts, Paul J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Gen Thorac & Vasc Surg, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Box 242 UMHC, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Santa Barbara Cottage Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Coll, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Iowa Methodist Med Ctr, Des Moines, IA USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Carmel, IN USA
[7] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
faculty development; surgical education; general surgery; Delphi consensus method; OPERATING-ROOM; PERCEPTIONS; RESIDENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.05.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Faculty teaching skills are critical for effective surgical education, however, which skills are most important to be taught in a faculty development program have not been well defined. The objective of this study was to identify priorities for faculty development as perceived by surgical educators. DESIGN: We used a modified Delphi methodology to assess faculty perceptions of the value of faculty development activities, best learning modalities, as well as barriers and priorities for faculty development. An expert panel developed the initial survey and distributed it to the membership of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Responses were reviewed by the expert panel and condensed to 3 key questions that were redistributed to the survey participants for final ranking. PARTICIPANTS: Seven experts reviewed responses to 8 questions by 110 participants. 35 participants determined the final ranking responses to 3 key questions. RESULTS: The top three priorities for faculty development were: 1) Resident assessment/evaluation and feed-back 2) Coaching for faculty teaching, and 3) Improving intraoperative teaching skills. The top 3 learning modalities were: 1) Coaching 2) Interactive small group sessions, and 3) Video-based education. Barriers to implementing faculty development included time limitations, clinical workload, faculty interest, and financial support. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty development programs should focus on resident assessment methods, intraoperative and general faculty teaching skills using a combination of coaching, small group didactic and video-based education. Concerted efforts to recognize and financially reward the value of teaching and faculty development is required to support these endeavors and improve the learning environment for both residents and faculty. ((C) 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:1504 / 1512
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1969, DELPHI METHOD EXPT S
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, COMM PROGR REQ
  • [3] [Anonymous], PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT
  • [4] Disparities between resident and attending surgeon perceptions of intraoperative teaching
    Butvidas, Lynn D.
    Anderson, Cheryl I.
    Balogh, Daniel
    Basson, Marc D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 201 (03) : 385 - 389
  • [5] Comparing resident measurements to attending surgeon self-perceptions of surgical educators
    Claridge, JA
    Calland, JF
    Chandrasekhara, V
    Young, JS
    Sanfey, H
    Schirmer, BD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 185 (04) : 323 - 327
  • [6] A Theory-Based Model for Teaching and Assessing Residents in the Operating Room
    DaRosa, Debra A.
    Zwischenberger, Joseph B.
    Meyerson, Shari L.
    George, Brian C.
    Teitelbaum, Ezra N.
    Soper, Nathaniel J.
    Fryer, Jonathan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 70 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [7] Gagnon LH, 2017, AM J SURG
  • [8] George Brian C, 2014, J Surg Educ, V71, pe90, DOI 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.018
  • [9] Green John M, 2016, J Surg Educ, V73, pe14, DOI 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.016
  • [10] Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
    Harris, Paul A.
    Taylor, Robert
    Thielke, Robert
    Payne, Jonathon
    Gonzalez, Nathaniel
    Conde, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 377 - 381