A comparison of ultrasound alone vs ultrasound with nerve stimulation guidance for continuous femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

被引:10
|
作者
Kim, Hee-Young [1 ,2 ]
Byeon, Gyeong-Jo [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Hyun-Jun [1 ]
Baek, Seung-Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Sang-Wook [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Hyung-Jun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Yangsan Hosp, Res Inst Convergence Biomed Sci & Technol, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Yangsan Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, South Korea
关键词
Femoral nerve; Knee arthroplasty; Nerve block; Nerve stimulation; Patient-controlled analgesia; Ultrasonography; CONTINUOUS 3-IN-ONE BLOCK; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; MOTOR RESPONSE; LOCALIZATION; CATHETER; REHABILITATION; PARESTHESIA; VOLUNTEER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.08.012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare analgesic efficacy of ultrasound (US) guidance alone and US guidance combined with nerve stimulation (NS) for continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Design: Prospective, randomized double-blind trial. Setting: Postanesthesia care unit and general ward. Patients: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status Ito II patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia. Interventions: In group A (n = 25), an 18-gauge Tuohy needle was directed at the lower mid-part of the femoral nerve, and a nonstimulating catheter was inserted through the needle under US guidance. In group B (n = 25), an 18-gauge Tuohy needle and stimulating catheter were directed to the lower part of femoral nerve under US guidance, and quadriceps muscle contraction was checked using NS. All patients received a 20-mL loading dose of 0.2% ropivacaine, a continuous infusion of 4 mL/h, and a 4-mL bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine with a lockout time of 60 minutes for patient-controlled analgesia. Measurements: The primary outcome was resting and exercising pain quality assessed by numeric rating scale. Other outcomes included procedure time for correct catheter placement, block failure rate, patient satisfaction for postoperative pain control, total dose of local anesthetic, additional opioid requirement, and adverse effects postoperatively. Main Results: There were no significant differences between groups in resting and exercising numeric rating scale. Procedure times were longer in group B than group A (P < .05). There were no significant differences between groups in block failure rate or other outcomes. Conclusions: US-guided CFNB was associated with similar analgesic efficacy and block failure rate and reduced procedure time compared to US with NS guidance for CFNB in patients undergoing TKA. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 280
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The analgesic efficacy of sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grape, S.
    Kirkham, K. R.
    Baeriswyl, M.
    Albrecht, E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (10) : 1198 - 1209
  • [42] Comparison of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block and knee periarticular infiltration for postoperative pain and functional outcomes in knee arthroplasty - A randomised trial
    Eid, Gehan M.
    Shaban, Shiamaa El Said
    Mostafa, Tarek A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (10) : 885 - 892
  • [43] Multimodal Periarticular Injection Vs Continuous Femoral Nerve Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ng, Fu-Yuen
    Ng, Jacobus Kwok-Fu
    Chiu, Kwong-Yuen
    Yan, Chun-Hoi
    Chan, Chi-Wing
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (06) : 1234 - 1238
  • [44] A prospective randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided versus nerve stimulation guided distal sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa
    van Geffen, G. J.
    van den Broek, E.
    Braak, G. J. J.
    Giele, J. L. P.
    Gielen, M. J.
    Scheffer, G. J.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2009, 37 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [45] The adductor canal block provides effective analgesia similar to a femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty-a retrospective study
    Patterson, Matthew E.
    Bland, Kim S.
    Thomas, Leslie C.
    Elliott, Clint E.
    Soberon, Jose R., Jr.
    Nossaman, Bobby D.
    Osteen, Kristie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2015, 27 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [46] Comparison of ultrasound and ultrasound plus nerve stimulator guidance axillary plexus block
    Demirelli, Gokhan
    Baskan, Semih
    Karabeyoglu, Isil
    Aytac, Ismail
    Ornek, Dilsen Hatice
    Erdogmus, Alper
    Baydar, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (04) : 508 - 512
  • [47] Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block vs Combined Femoral and Periarticular Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Mahadevan, Devendra
    Walter, Richard P.
    Minto, Gary
    Gale, Thomas C.
    McAllen, Christoph J.
    Oldman, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (10) : 1806 - 1811
  • [48] Control of postoperative pain in knee arthroplasty: single dose femoral nerve block versus continuous femoral block
    Soto Mesa, D.
    Del Valle Ruiz, V.
    Fayad Fayad, M.
    Cosio Carreno, F.
    Blanco Rodriguez, I.
    Gonzalez Castano, R.
    Bermejo Alvarez, M. A.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2012, 59 (04): : 204 - 209
  • [49] Effects of Postoperative Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Analgesia with Braun Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Catheter Set versus Novel Needle-Over-Cannula after Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Yu, Bin
    Hu, Xiaoxue
    Zou, Tianxiao
    He, Miao
    Cai, Guangyu
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 1843 - 1849
  • [50] Comparison of local infiltration analgesia with single injection femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty
    Schwab, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Yombi, JeanCyr
    Lavand Homme, Patricia
    Thienpont, Emmanuel
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2019, 85 (01): : 122 - 129