Variances in sagittal femoral shaft bowing in patients undergoing TKA

被引:32
作者
Yehyawi, Tameem M.
Callaghan, John J.
Pedersen, Douglas R.
O'Rourke, Michael R.
Liu, Steve S.
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] VA Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e4a2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We asked, "What are the quantitative variances in sagittal femoral bowing in patients who were indicated for total knee arthroplasty?" We retrospectively evaluated 145 consecutive patients who underwent 166 primary total knee arthroplasties with adequate preoperative nonrotated sagittal plane full-leg lateral radiographs. Digital radiographs were processed such that each femoral shaft was divided into three segments. A purpose-written program determined the flexion/extension of the femoral component using the Knee Society method of focusing on the distal femur and a second method using the whole femur. The median angle of curvature of the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the femora were 5.4 degrees, 0.2 degrees, and 3.1 degrees, respectively, with the largest bow occurring in the proximal segment followed by the distal segment and with the least bow in the middle segment. The median angles for femoral component flexion were considerably different with the whole femur angle showing more flexion (4 degrees) than that of the Knee Society angle (1.421 degrees). We found an inverse relationship between distal angle of curvature and height as well as weight. Men had greater proximal bowing and less distal bowing than women. The effects of these variances may have implications in development of osteoarthritis and total knee arthroplasty component survival.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Berend, ME ;
Ritter, MA ;
Meding, JB ;
Faris, PM ;
Keating, EM ;
Redelman, R ;
Faris, GW ;
Davis, KE .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (428) :26-34
[2]   Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty [J].
Callaghan, JJ ;
O'Rourke, MR ;
Goetz, DA ;
Schmalzried, TP ;
Campbell, PA ;
Johnston, RC .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (404) :83-88
[3]  
EWALD FC, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9
[4]  
Fehring TK, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P315
[5]  
INSALL JN, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P13
[6]   Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements [J].
Keating, EM ;
Meding, JB ;
Faris, PM ;
Ritter, MA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (404) :34-39
[7]   INFLUENCE OF POSITIONING OF PROSTHESIS IN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT [J].
LOTKE, PA ;
ECKER, ML .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (01) :77-79
[8]  
MORELAND JR, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P49
[9]  
Petersen T L, 1988, J Arthroplasty, V3, P67, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(88)80054-8
[10]   Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? [J].
Sharkey, PF ;
Hozack, WJ ;
Rothman, RH ;
Shastri, S ;
Jacoby, SM .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (404) :7-13