共 30 条
Disinfection of acrylic denture resin polymer with Rose Bengal, Methylene blue and Porphyrin derivative in photodynamic therapy
被引:27
|作者:
Alhenaki, Aasem M.
[1
]
Alqarawi, Firas K.
[2
]
Tanveer, Syeda A.
[3
]
Alshahrani, Faris A.
[2
]
Alshahrani, Abdullah
[1
]
AlHamdan, Eman M.
[1
]
Alzahrani, Khaled M.
[4
]
Aldahiyan, Nada
[5
]
Naseem, Mustafa
[6
]
Vohra, Fahim
[1
]
Abduljabbar, Tariq
[1
]
机构:
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthet Dent Sci Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Substitut Dent Sci, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[3] Dow Int Dent Coll, Coll Dent, Dept Oral Biol, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Prince Sattam Bin AbdulAziz Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent Sci, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Dow Int Dent Coll, Dept Community & Prevent Dent Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词:
Rose Bengal;
Porphyrin derivative;
Methylene blue;
Denture;
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy;
STREPTOCOCCUS-MUTANS;
ORAL MICROBIOME;
ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY;
CANDIDA-ALBICANS;
INACTIVATION;
HEALTH;
D O I:
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102362
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Aim: The study aimed to assess the effect of in-vitro chlorhexidine and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) disinfection protocols against acrylic resin specimens colonized with S. mutans, S. aureus, E. coli, and C. albicans. Material and Methods: Reference strains of S. mutans, S. aureus, E. coli, and C. albicans were tested. Sixteen blocks of acrylic specimens were prepared by heat-cure acrylic resin and contaminated by in-vitro biofilm growth. Specimens in group 1, group 2 and group 3 were treated with Rose Bengal (RB), methylene blue (MB) 500 mg/L and porphyrin derivative (PD) 5 ml respectively, for the sensitization of biofilms. All photosensitizers (PS) were activated by LED at different wavelength. CHX was prepared in sterile distilled water and applied for 60 s. Each contaminated specimen was sprayed on all its surfaces with the aforementioned photosensitizers and control CHX. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to test the effect of the treatments and Tukey multiple comparison tests to compare means OF CFU/mL (log10) for exposed E. coli, C. albicans, S aureus, and S. mutans Results: Specimens treated with 0.12% CHX (control) demonstrated a significant reduction in CFU/mL (log10) for exposed E. coli; 2.04 +/- 0.07 CFU/mL, C. albicans; 2.09 +/- 0.85 CFU/mL, S aureus; 3.04 +/- 0.11 CFU/mL, and S. mutans; 2.54 +/- 0.91 CFU/mL. The intragroup comparison revealed E.coli did not exhibit a decrease in reduction CFU/mL (log10) when acrylic resin irradiated with RB 5 mu m. Whereas, CFU/mL (log10) values of S.aureus; 3.62 +/- 0.68 and S.mutans; 3.41 +/- 0.13 plummeted (p<0.05). Intergroup comparison showed E.coli values to display comparable reduction when disinfected with MB 500 mg/L and 0.12% CHX; 3.16 +/- 0.34 and 2.04 +/- 0.07 CFU/mL (log10) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Photosensitizers (RB, MB, PD) are selective in reducing bacterial count on acrylic resin blocks. CHX was found to be effective against all bacteria E.coli, C.albicans, S.aureus, and S.mutans at a concentration of 0.12%.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文