Magnetron Sputtering vs. Electrodeposition for Hard Chrome Coatings: A Comparison of Environmental and Economic Performances

被引:24
作者
Merlo, Antoine [1 ]
Leonard, Gregoire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Dept Chem Engn, Quartier Agora B6a Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
magnetron sputtering; electrodeposition; chromium coating; technology comparison; life cycle assessment; economic analysis; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM; LUNG-CANCER; THIN-FILMS; DEPOSITION; SPECIATION; WATER; CR;
D O I
10.3390/ma14143823
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The coating of materials with specific films is widely used to improve material properties and many technologies exist to perform it. In the last few years, the replacement of wet electrodeposition processes has been continuously encouraged in the EU due to the problematic waste management linked to those processes. In this paper, magnetron sputtering is studied as an alternative to conventional electrodeposition by comparing the technologies' environmental impacts and costs. From the study, it appears that while magnetron sputtering greatly reduces hexavalent chromium emissions over the production, it has an increased electricity consumption mostly due to its lower production capacity, thus leading to more greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, a short discussion on the quantification of the impact of hexavalent chromium emissions is conducted. Regarding costs, the electrodeposition process has a lower cost of investment and of consumables, but requires more work time for the different steps of the process, making the total price per functional unit roughly equal. However, the cost per functional unit strongly depends on assumptions on the required work time, for which a sensitivity study is performed. Finally, the impacts of these two competing coating processes are discussed to complete the technological comparison for the case of hard chromium deposition.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Terrestrial and aquatic ecotoxicity assessment of Cr(VI) by the ReCiPe method calculation (LCIA): application on an old industrial contaminated site
    Adam, Veronique
    Quaranta, Gaetana
    Loyaux-Lawniczak, Stephanie
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (05) : 3312 - 3321
  • [2] Advance Rubtech, 2020, LIST HARD CHROM PLAT
  • [3] AJA International Inc, 2020, SPUTT SYST CAT
  • [4] High power pulsed magnetron sputtering: Fundamentals and applications
    Alami, J.
    Bolz, S.
    Sarakinos, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS, 2009, 483 (1-2) : 530 - 534
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, J MACH ENG
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1998, TOXICOLOGICAL REV TR
  • [7] HARD CHROME COATINGS DEPOSITED BY PHYSICAL VAPOR-DEPOSITION
    AUBERT, A
    GILLET, R
    GAUCHER, A
    TERRAT, JP
    [J]. THIN SOLID FILMS, 1983, 108 (02) : 165 - 172
  • [8] Benveniste G., 2007, P 3 INT C LIF CYCL M
  • [9] Evaluation of the photocatalytic antimicrobial effects of a TiO2 nanocomposite food packaging film by in vitro and in vivo tests
    Bodaghi, Hojatollah
    Mostofi, Younes
    Oromiehie, Abdulrasoul
    Zamani, Zabihollah
    Ghanbarzadeh, Babak
    Costa, Cristina
    Conte, Amalia
    Del Nobile, Matteo Alessandro
    [J]. LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 50 (02) : 702 - 706
  • [10] Mechanical and tribological properties of electrolytic hard chrome and HVOF-sprayed coatings
    Bolelli, G
    Cannillo, V
    Lusvarghi, L
    Riccò, S
    [J]. SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 200 (09) : 2995 - 3009