Fluoroquinolone susceptibility, resistance, and pharmacodynamics versus clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Indiana

被引:14
作者
Kays, MB [1 ]
Denys, GA
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Pharm & Pharmacal Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp, Clarian Hlth Partners Inc, Clin Lab Serv, Indianapolis, IN 46206 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(01)00277-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics (AUC(0-24)/MIC) of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gemifloxacin were evaluated against 307 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Indianapolis, Indiana. Organisms were collected between January 1999 and April 2000, and MICs were determined by broth microdilution. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for the following oral regimens administered once daily: levofloxacin 500 mg and 750 mg; gatifloxacin 400 mg; moxifloxacin 400 mg; gemifloxacin 320 mg. Free 24 h area under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC(0-24)) were calculated, and the average AUC(0-24)/MIC was calculated for each regimen. Differences in AUC(0-24)/MIC among agents were determined by analysis of variance (Scheffe post-hoc test, p < 0.05). Overall, gemifloxacin was the most potent agent tested. Five (1.7%), 4 (1.3%), and 2 (0.7%) isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively. None of the isolates was resistant to gemifloxacin. Gemifloxacin AUC(0-24)/MIC was significantly greater than all other regimens (p < 0.0001), with the exception of moxifloxacin. However, the percent of isolates for which an AUC(0-24)/MIC greater than or equal to 30-50 can be achieved is similar for gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin 750 mg. Large comparative studies are needed to determine if the differences in AUC(0-24)/MIC among fluoroquinolones are clinically significant. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 198
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Effect of Maalox® on the bioavailability of oral gemifloxacin in healthy volunteers [J].
Allen, A ;
Vousden, M ;
Porter, A ;
Lewis, A .
CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 45 (06) :504-511
[2]   Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of oral gemifloxacin in healthy volunteers [J].
Allen, A ;
Vousden, M ;
Lewis, A .
CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 45 (06) :496-503
[3]   Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of gemifloxacin (SB-265805) after administration of single oral doses to healthy volunteers [J].
Allen, A ;
Bygate, E ;
Oliver, S ;
Johnson, M ;
Ward, C ;
Cheon, AJ ;
Choo, YS ;
Kim, IC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (06) :1604-1608
[4]  
[Anonymous], M100S10 NCCLS
[5]  
Bartlett John G., 2000, Clinical Infectious Diseases, V31, P347, DOI 10.1086/313954
[6]   Comparison of the antibacterial activities of the quinolones Bay 12-8039, gatifloxacin (AM 1155), trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin [J].
Bauernfeind, A .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 40 (05) :639-651
[7]  
Bauernfeind A., 1999, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, V43, P77, DOI 10.1093/jac/43.suppl_3.77
[8]   A review of the comparative in-vitro activities of 12 antimicrobial agents, with a focus on five new 'respiratory quinolones' [J].
Blondeau, JM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 :1-11
[9]   Efflux and target mutations as quinolone resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae [J].
Broskey, J ;
Coleman, K ;
Gwynn, MN ;
McCloskey, L ;
Traini, C ;
Voelker, L ;
Warren, R .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 45 :95-99
[10]   Decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones in Canada [J].
Chen, DK ;
McGeer, A ;
de Azavedo, JC ;
Low, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (04) :233-239