Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and Green Seal-compliant industrial and institutional cleaning products

被引:21
作者
Kapur, Amit [1 ]
Baldwin, Cheryl [1 ]
Swanson, Mary [1 ]
Wilberforce, Nana [1 ]
McClenachan, Giovanna [1 ]
Rentschler, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Green Seal, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Cleaning products; Ecolabel; Environmentally preferable; Environmental impact; Green; Green seal; GS-37; Institutional; LCA; Standard;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-011-0373-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to use life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to assess the environmental impacts of industrial and institutional cleaning products that are compliant with the Green Seal Standard for Cleaning Products for Industrial and Institutional Use, GS-37, and conventional products (non-GS-37-compliant) products. The scope of the study was "cradle-to-grave," to encompass the energy and material resources required for the production of raw material and packaging components to use and final disposal of the cleaning product. The generic functional unit for this study was annual cleaning of 100,000 ft(2) of office space. The ReCiPe 2008 Midpoint (hierarchist perspective) impact assessment methodology was used including the following impact categories: climate change, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidant formation, particulate matter formation, human toxicity, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, agricultural land occupation, natural land transformation, water depletion, and fossil depletion. General-purpose, glass, and restroom cleaning products were included in the study. Model products of GS-37-compliant, conventional concentrate, and conventional ready-to-use versions of each cleaning product were evaluated in the study. The conventional ready-to-use industrial and institutional cleaning product had the highest environmental impact in all product types and for the most impact categories analyzed. The GS-37-compliant products were lower than the conventional products in most impact categories studied. Furthermore, normalization of the results showed that the impact categories of marine ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and freshwater ecotoxicity were dominant, and the conventional products led these impact categories. The packaging and distribution stages were dominant for the conventional products, whereas the product formula (i.e., chemicals used in the product) contributed significantly to overall impacts for GS-37-compliant products. This is because the GS-37 standard addresses packaging and distribution, but could potentially further address the formula considerations. The comparative life cycle assessment performed in this study showed that the Green Seal Standard for Cleaning Products for Industrial and Institutional Use, GS-37, identifies products with notably lower environmental impact compared to typical alternatives in the market. This reduced impact was a result of the requirements in the Green Seal standard that addressed the leading sources of the impacts (namely packaging, transportation) and is not included in any other standard or recognition program in North America.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 387
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] An application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a green marketing tool for agricultural products: the case of extra-virgin olive oil in Val di Cornia, Italy
    Iraldo, Fabio
    Testa, Francesco
    Bartolozzi, Irene
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (01) : 78 - 103
  • [42] Comparative life cycle assessment of large-scale 3D printing utilizing kaolinite-based calcium sulfoaluminate cement concrete and conventional construction
    Abu-Ennab, L.
    Dixit, M. K.
    Birgisson, B.
    Kumar, P. Pradeep
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 5
  • [43] Life cycle inventory and life cycle impact assessment datasets of an industrial-scale milk fractionation process generating 5 co-products: Cream, casein, lactose and two whey-protein ingre dients enriche d in α-lactalbumin or β-lactoglobulin
    Guyomarc'h, Fanny
    Hequet, Felicie
    Le Feon, Samuel
    Leconte, Nadine
    Garnier-Lambrouin, Fabienne
    Auberger, Julie
    Malnoe, Caroline
    Penicaud, Caroline
    Gesan-Guiziou, Genevieve
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2024, 55
  • [44] Life cycle carbon assessment of decarbonising UK's hard-to-treat homes: A comparative study of conventional retrofit vs EnerPHit, heat pump first vs fabric first and ecological vs petrochemical retrofit approaches
    Mohammadpourkarbasi, Haniyeh
    Riddle, Ben
    Liu, Chenfei
    Sharples, Steve
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 296