Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:27
作者
Li, Mingjia [1 ]
Wang, Ge [2 ]
Xu, Jinliang [2 ]
Ni, Jingwei [1 ]
Sun, Enhui [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Minist Educ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab Multiphase Flow & Heat Transfer L, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
S-CO(2)power plant; ultra-supercritical water-steam Rankine cycle power plant; life cycle assessment; energy efficiency; environment impact; economic performance; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BRAYTON CYCLE; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; CO2; PERFORMANCE; OPTIMIZATION; LAYOUTS; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11630-020-1327-x
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this paper is to understand the benefits that one can achieve for large-scale supercritical CO2(S-CO2) coal-fired power plants. The aspects of energy environment and economy of 1000 MW S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system and 1000 MW ultra-supercritical (USC) water-steam Rankine cycle coal-fired power generation system are analyzed and compared at the similar main vapor parameters, by adopting the neural network genetic algorithm and life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Multi-objective optimization of the 1000 MW S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is further carried out. The power generation efficiency, environmental impact load, and investment recovery period are adopted as the objective functions. The main vapor parameters of temperature and pressure are set as the decision variables. The results are concluded as follows. First, the total energy consumption of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is 10.48 MJ/kWh and the energy payback ratio is 34.37%. The performance is superior to the USC coal-fired power generation system. Second, the resource depletion index of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is 4.38 mu PRchina,90, which is lower than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, and the resource consumption is less. Third, the environmental impact load of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is 0.742 mPE(china,90), which is less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, 0.783 mPE(china,90). Among all environmental impact types, human toxicity potential HTP and global warming potential GWP account for the most environmental impact. Finally, the investment cost of the S-CO(2)coal-fired power generation system is generally less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system because the cost of the S-CO(2)turbine is only half of the cost of the steam turbine. The optimal turbine inlet temperatureT(5)becomes smaller, and the optimal turbine inlet pressure is unchanged at 622.082 degrees C/30 MPa.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 484
页数:22
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   Organic Rankine cycle saves energy and reduces gas emissions for cement production [J].
Wang, Huarong ;
Xu, Jinliang ;
Yang, Xufei ;
Miao, Zheng ;
Yu, Chao .
ENERGY, 2015, 86 :59-73
[42]   A systematic comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants [J].
Wang, Kun ;
Li, Ming-Jia ;
Guo, Jia-Qi ;
Li, Peiwen ;
Liu, Zhan-Bin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 :109-121
[43]   Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a molten salt solar power tower integrated with a recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle based on integrated modeling [J].
Wang, Kun ;
He, Ya-Ling .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 135 :336-350
[44]  
Wang XC, 2013, 43 CASE STUDIES MATL
[45]   Birth to death analysis of the energy payback ratio and CO2 gas emission rates from coal, fission, wind, and DT-fusion electrical power plants [J].
White, SW ;
Kulcinski, GL .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 48 (3-4) :473-481
[46]   Comparative life cycle assessment and economic analysis of typical flue-gas cleaning processes of coal-fired power plants in China [J].
Wu, Xuecheng ;
Wu, Kai ;
Zhang, Yongxin ;
Hong, Qiaoqiao ;
Zheng, Chenghang ;
Gao, Xiang ;
Cen, Kefa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :3236-3242
[47]   Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant [J].
Xu, Jinliang ;
Sun, Enhui ;
Li, Mingjia ;
Liu, Huan ;
Zhu, Bingguo .
ENERGY, 2018, 157 :227-246
[48]  
Yang J. X., 1998, J ENVIRON SCI, V6, P21
[49]  
Yang P, 2006, CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IN ABRASIVE TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, P7
[50]  
Yang S., 2002, COLLOQ MATH-WARSAW, V18, P102