Beyond dislike: Blatant dehumanization predicts teacher discrimination

被引:60
作者
Bruneau, Emile [1 ,2 ]
Szekeres, Hanna [3 ]
Kteily, Nour [4 ]
Tropp, Linda R. [5 ]
Kende, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19204 USA
[2] Beyond Conflict Innovat Lab, Boston, MA USA
[3] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA USA
关键词
dehumanization; discrimination; education; prejudice; student; teacher; IMPLICIT PREJUDICED ATTITUDES; ROMA; EXPECTATIONS; RACE; CONSEQUENCES; ACHIEVEMENT; CONFLICT; MINORITY; VICTIMS; HOSTILE;
D O I
10.1177/1368430219845462
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
School teachers have been shown to favor ethnic majority over minority students. However, it is unclear what psychological processes motivate ethnicity-based discrimination. Of the studies that have examined the psychological roots of teacher discrimination, most have focused on implicit or explicit prejudice. We propose an alternate predictor: dehumanization. Using a within-subject paradigm with a small-scale experiment (N = 29) and a larger scale replication (N = 161), we find that Hungarian preservice teachers consistently discriminate against Roma minority students by recommending that they be denied entry to higher track secondary schools, and preferentially placing them into lower track schools, relative to equally qualified ethnic majority Hungarian students, and that the severity of the ethnic tracking bias is predicted by dehumanization (but not prejudice). In fact, the relationship between dehumanization and discrimination holds (and may be significantly stronger) for teachers who express the lowest levels of prejudice towards the Roma.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 577
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[51]  
Ringold D., 2000, ROMA TRANSITION CENT
[52]   Discrimination and the implicit association test [J].
Rudman, Laurie A. ;
Ashmore, Richard D. .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2007, 10 (03) :359-372
[53]   Afterimages of savages: Implicit associations between 'primitives', animals and children [J].
Saminaden, Annick ;
Loughnan, Stephen ;
Haslam, Nick .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 49 (01) :91-105
[54]   How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytic answer [J].
Schutz, H ;
Six, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 1996, 20 (3-4) :441-462
[55]   Discrimination in grading: experimental evidence from primary school teachers [J].
Sprietsma, Maresa .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (01) :523-538
[56]  
Stephan W.G., 2001, Improving intergroup relations, DOI 10.4135/9781452229225
[57]   Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis [J].
Talaska, Cara A. ;
Fiske, Susan T. ;
Chaiken, Shelly .
SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2008, 21 (03) :263-296
[58]   Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups [J].
Tropp, LR ;
Pettigrew, TF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (12) :951-957
[59]   The Implicit Prejudiced Attitudes of Teachers: Relations to Teacher Expectations and the Ethnic Achievement Gap [J].
van den Bergh, Linda ;
Denessen, Eddie ;
Hornstra, Lisette ;
Voeten, Marinus ;
Holland, Rob W. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (02) :497-527
[60]   Mainstreaming of Racist Anti-Roma Discourses in the Media in Hungary [J].
Vidra, Zsuzsanna ;
Fox, Jon .
JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE STUDIES, 2014, 12 (04) :437-455