Food Marketing to Children Through Toys Response of Restaurants to the First U.S. Toy Ordinance

被引:30
作者
Otten, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Hekler, Eric B. [1 ]
Krukowski, Rebecca A. [3 ]
Buman, Matthew P. [1 ]
Saelens, Brian E. [4 ]
Gardner, Christopher D. [1 ]
King, Abby C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Epidemiol, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: On August 9, 2010, Santa Clara County CA became the first U. S. jurisdiction to implement an ordinance that prohibits the distribution of toys and other incentives to children in conjunction with meals, foods, or beverages that do not meet minimal nutritional criteria. Restaurants had many different options for complying with this ordinance, such as introducing more healthful menu options, reformulating current menu items, or changing marketing or toy distribution practices. Purpose: To assess how ordinance-affected restaurants changed their child menus, marketing, and toy distribution practices relative to non-affected restaurants. Methods: Children's menu items and child-directed marketing and toy distribution practices were examined before and at two time points after ordinance implementation (from July through November 2010) at ordinance-affected fast-food restaurants compared with demographically matched unaffected same-chain restaurants using the Children's Menu Assessment tool. Results: Affected restaurants showed a 2.8- to 3.4-fold improvement in Children's Menu Assessment scores from pre- to post-ordinance with minimal changes at unaffected restaurants. Response to the ordinance varied by restaurant. Improvements were seen in on-site nutritional guidance; promotion of healthy meals, beverages, and side items; and toy marketing and distribution activities. Conclusions: The ordinance appears to have positively influenced marketing of healthful menu items and toys as well as toy distribution practices at ordinance-affected restaurants, but did not affect the number of healthful food items offered. (Am J Prev Med 2012;42(1):56-60) (C) 2012 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 60
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BECK MA, 2011, ASS PRESS 0201
[2]  
Federal Trade Commission, 2008, MARK FOOD CHILDR AD
[3]  
Harris J.L., 2010, Fast food F.A.C.T.S.: Evaluating fast food nutrition and marketing to youth
[4]  
Koplan J.P., 2005, Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance
[5]   The Children's Menu Assessment: Development, Evaluation, and Relevance of a Tool for Evaluating Children's Menus [J].
Krukowski, Rebecca A. ;
Eddings, Kenya ;
West, Delia Smith .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, 111 (06) :884-888
[6]  
MARTINEZ M, 2010, CNN 1123
[7]  
McGinnis J.M., 2006, FOOD MARKETING CHILD
[8]  
PEDDYCORD D, REPORT REGARDING PUB
[9]  
ROBBINS L, 2011, NY TIMES 0405
[10]   Nutrition environment measures study in restaurants (NEMS-R) - Development and evaluation [J].
Saelens, Brian E. ;
Glanz, Karen ;
Sallis, James F. ;
Frank, Lawrence D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 32 (04) :273-281