Experimental quantitative comparison of different control architectures for master-slave teleoperation

被引:77
作者
Aliaga, M [1 ]
Rubio, A
Sánchez, E
机构
[1] LANDER Simulat & Training Solut SA, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
[2] CEIT Gipuzkoa, Dept Appl Mech, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
bilateral control; force feedback; performance comparison; teleoperation;
D O I
10.1109/TCST.2003.819586
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A procedure for experimental evaluation and objective/quantitative comparison among the different teleoperation architectures and systems is proposed. It is based on the analysis of the different matrices that can define the teleoperated system (two-port representations) and the selection of a set of four parameters that are easy to estimate via simple experimentation: free Motion impedance, position tracking in free movement, force tracking in hard contact tasks and maximum transmittable impedance. These parameters provide complete characterization of the master-slave system and have clear physical interpretation. Furthermore, they require no maneouvering of the slave robot, which is very useful in the case of heavy or nonaccessible industrial robots. The method has been applied to compare position-position (PP), force-position (FP), and four-channel (4C) controllers in a 2 DOF master-slave system. Experimental measuring for all four parameters will be shown, proving the 4C architecture clearly better than any other.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 11
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ALIAGA I, 2000, THESIS
[2]  
COLGATE JE, 1994, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P3205, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1994.351077
[3]   Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation [J].
Daniel, RW ;
McAree, PR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1998, 17 (08) :811-830
[4]  
FITE KB, ASME J DYNAM SYST ME, V123, P400
[5]   Control design and stability analysis of a surgical teleoperator [J].
Flemmer, H ;
Eriksson, B ;
Wikander, J .
MECHATRONICS, 1999, 9 (07) :843-866
[6]   A DESIGN FRAMEWORK FOR TELEOPERATORS WITH KINESTHETIC FEEDBACK [J].
HANNAFORD, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1989, 5 (04) :426-434
[7]   STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE TRADEOFFS IN BILATERAL TELEMANIPULATION [J].
HANNAFORD, B .
PROCEEDINGS - 1989 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL 1-3, 1989, :1764-1767
[8]  
Hashtrudi-Zaad K, 1999, ICRA '99: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, P1863, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1999.770380
[9]  
HOGAN N, 1985, J DYNAM SYST MEASURE, V107
[10]   STABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN BILATERAL TELEOPERATION [J].
LAWRENCE, DA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1993, 9 (05) :624-637