Examining the Prospective Relationship Between Communication Network Structure and Task Cohesion and Team Performance

被引:11
作者
Mclaren, Colin D. [1 ]
Spink, Kevin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Kinesiol, 87 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada
关键词
information exchange; social network analysis; centrality; density; group; dynamics; SPORT; INFORMATION; ORGANIZATIONS; PREDICTOR; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1037/gdn0000110
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been reported in past research that information exchange at the individual and team level (i.e., communication network structure) is associated with higher perceived task cohesion and team performance. The current study extended these findings to intact sport teams and tested these relationships across time. Competitive basketball athletes (N = 133, k = 15; M-age = 27.4, SD = 7.5 years) completed measures of information exchange with teammates during a game (peer nominations using social network analysis) and task cohesion. Performance was collected using objective winning percentage. A prospective design across the first half of a competitive season was used. Controlling for early season perceptions of task cohesion, interacting with a higher number of teammates, and higher collective information exchange at the team level at early season significantly predicted later task cohesion perceptions (n = 70; pseudo R-2 = .49). Using a multilevel model, the overall variance accounted for was captured at both the individual (42%) and team (7%) level. In a second analysis, a hierarchical regression controlling for early season team performance found that information exchange of the team as a whole at early season significantly predicted team performance (n = 109; R-adj(2) = .48, p < .001). These results highlight a pattern of relationships between information exchange and both task cohesion and team performance consistent with past theorizing. In terms of uniqueness, specific aspects of information exchange (i.e., individual vs. team level network structure) differed for each dependent variable.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 87
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Balkundi P, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P49, DOI [10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500, 10.2307/20159745]
[2]   Expectancy information and coach effectiveness in intercollegiate basketball [J].
Becker, AJ ;
Solomon, GB .
SPORT PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 19 (03) :251-266
[3]   A prospective multilevel examination of the relationship between cohesion and team performance in elite youth sport [J].
Benson, Alex J. ;
Siska, Pavol ;
Eys, Mark ;
Priklerova, Silvia ;
Slepicka, Pavel .
PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2016, 27 :39-46
[4]  
Borgatti S. P., 2013, Analyzing Social Networks
[5]  
Carron A., 2002, The Group Environment Questionnaire test manual
[6]  
Carron A.V., 2012, Group dynamics in sport, V4th
[7]  
Carron A.V., 1998, Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement, P213, DOI DOI 10.1123/JSEP.24.2.168
[8]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS COHESION IN SPORT TEAMS - THE GROUP ENVIRONMENT QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
CARRON, AV ;
WIDMEYER, WN ;
BRAWLEY, LR .
JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 7 (03) :244-266
[9]   Cohesion - Conceptual and measurement issues [J].
Carron, AV ;
Brawley, LR .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2000, 31 (01) :89-106
[10]   Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis [J].
Carron, AV ;
Colman, MM ;
Wheeler, J ;
Stevens, D .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 24 (02) :168-188