Field evaluation of the performance of engineered on-site wastewater treatment units

被引:13
作者
Lowe, Kathryn S.
Van Cuyk, Sheila M. [2 ]
Siegrist, Robert L.
Drewes, Joerg E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Environm Sci & Engn Div, Adv Water Technol Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Decis Applicat Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:8(735)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A conventional on-site wastewater system (OWS) is traditionally comprised of one or more septic tanks for treatment of raw wastewater followed by percolation through natural soil to achieve purification prior to groundwater recharge. Other types of engineered treatment units (e.g., sand filters, textile media filters) may be implemented where site conditions are not suitable for conventional systems or in sensitive areas, such as those with nitrogen loading concerns. The research presented here is part of a large field study conducted to evaluate the purification performance of OWS employing three different engineered treatment units: a septic tank, a septic tank with a textile filter unit (TFU), and a septic tank with a membrane bioreactor (MBR). The TFU or MBR employ treatment processes that are designed to achieve higher purification compared to a septic tank so that soil treatment can be accomplished at higher hydraulic loading rates and/or with less unsaturated soil depth. This paper describes the installation, operation, and monitoring of the effluent generated from three engineered treatment units operated for a period of 16-28 months. The three treatment units, as expected, achieved different purification efficiencies for organic matter, total suspended solids, nutrients, and bacteria with the relative removal efficiency of MBR>TFU> septic tank. The relative degree of operational complexity, operation and maintenance requirements, energy use, and cost followed the same ranking.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 743
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
*APHA AWWA WPCF, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]  
DIMICK CA, 2005, THESIS COLORADO SCH
[3]  
*HACH CHEM CO, 1998, WAT AN HDB
[4]   Optimization of method for detecting and characterizing NOM by HPLC-size exclusion chromatography with UV and on-line DOC detection [J].
Her, N ;
Amy, G ;
Foss, D ;
Cho, J ;
Yoon, Y ;
Kosenka, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 36 (05) :1069-1076
[5]  
LARSSON E, 2004, THESIS LULEA U TECHN
[6]   Quantifying biological organic carbon removal in groundwater recharge systems [J].
Rauch, T ;
Drewes, JE .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (06) :909-923
[7]   Assessing the removal potential of soil-aquifer treatment systems for bulk organic matter [J].
Rauch, T ;
Drewes, L .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (02) :245-253
[8]  
USEPA, 2002, ONS WAST TREATM SYST
[9]  
Van Cuyk S, 2005, PERFORMANCE ENG TREA
[10]  
WREN A, 2003, THESIS COLORADO SCH