Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation

被引:17
作者
Pannek, J [1 ]
Grigoleit, U [1 ]
Hinkel, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Marienhosp Herne, Urol Klin, Dept Urol,Div Neurourol, D-44627 Herne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.01.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To analyze the bacterial contamination of conventional percutaneous nerve stimulation (PNE) leads. Sacral neuromodulation has become an important tool for the treatment of urgency and chronic retention. Patients likely to benefit from this type of therapy are identified by PNE testing before implantation of the definitive system. Recently, a new system was introduced, using a self-blocking electrode that remains in place for both PNE testing and final implantation. PNE testing warrants an extracorporeal stimulator. Thus, using the same electrode for both external stimulation and definitive implantation may carry a significant risk of infection. Methods. Bilateral PNE testing was performed in 11 consecutive patients (8 women and 3 men, mean age 41.6 years) for either urgency (n = 7) or chronic retention (n = 4). Electrodes were placed under aseptic conditions and stimulated for 3 days. At the end of each test, the electrodes were removed and evaluated microbiologically. Results. In 5 of the 11 patients (9 of 22 leads), significant bacterial growth was detected: Staphylococcus epidermidis in 5, Escherichia coli in 3, and Enterococcus faecalis in 1. However, no patient showed signs of inflammation at the electrode insertion sites. Conclusions. Bacterial growth was found in 45.5% of the patients after conventional PNE testing under aseptic conditions. Therefore, the new electrodes may well carry an elevated risk of infection. Infection of the implant can lead to major surgical revision or even explantation. Thus, additional studies of the infection risk of this new electrode are warranted before its general use can be recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1098
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Sacral neuromodulation in functional urinary retention: an effective way to restore voiding [J].
Aboseif, S ;
Tamaddon, K ;
Chalfin, S ;
Freedman, S ;
Mourad, MS ;
Chang, JH ;
Kaptein, JS .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (07) :662-665
[2]   The role of neuromodulation in the management of urinary urge incontinence [J].
Abrams, P ;
Blaivas, JG ;
Fowler, CJ ;
Fourcroy, JL ;
Macdiarmid, SA ;
Siegel, SW ;
Van Kerrebroeck, P .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 91 (04) :355-359
[3]   Neuromodulation by implant for treating lower urinary tract symptoms and dysfunction [J].
Bemelmans, BLH ;
Mundy, AR ;
Craggs, MD .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (02) :81-91
[4]   Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: Longterm results of a prospective longitudinal study [J].
Bosch, JLHR ;
Groen, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) :1219-1222
[5]   Tailored laminectomy: A new technique for neuromodulator implantation [J].
Braun, PM ;
Boschert, J ;
Bross, S ;
Scheepe, JR ;
Alken, P ;
Juenemann, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1607-1609
[6]   Long-term results of sacral neuromodulation for women with urinary retention [J].
Dasgupta, R ;
Wiseman, OJ ;
Kitchen, N ;
Fowler, CJ .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (03) :335-337
[7]   Bilateral chronic sacral neuromodulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction [J].
Hohenfellner, M ;
Schultz-Lampel, D ;
Dahms, S ;
Matzel, K ;
Thüroff, JW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (03) :821-824
[8]   Chronic sacral neuromodulation for treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction:: Long-term results with unilateral implants [J].
Hohenfellner, M ;
Humke, J ;
Hampel, C ;
Dahms, S ;
Matzel, K ;
Roth, S ;
Thüroff, JW ;
Schultz-Lampel, D .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :887-892
[9]   Long-term effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory urge incontinence [J].
Janknegt, RA ;
Hassouna, MM ;
Siegel, SW ;
Schmidt, RA ;
Gajewski, JB ;
Rivas, DA ;
Elhilali, MM ;
Milam, DC ;
van Kerrebroeck, PEV ;
Dijkema, HE ;
Nÿeholt, AABL ;
Fall, M ;
Jonas, U ;
Catanzaro, F ;
Fowler, CJ ;
Oleson, KA .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (01) :101-106
[10]   Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention:: Results 18 months after implantation [J].
Jonas, U ;
Fowler, CJ ;
Chancellor, MB ;
Elhilali, MM ;
Fall, M ;
Gajewski, JB ;
Grünewald, V ;
Hassouna, MM ;
vander Hombergh, U ;
Janknegt, R ;
van Kerrebroeck, PEV ;
Nijeholt, AABLA ;
Siegel, SW ;
Schmidt, RA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) :15-22