Geographically Weighted Spatial Unmixing for Spatiotemporal Fusion

被引:10
|
作者
Peng, Kaidi [1 ]
Wang, Qunming [1 ]
Tang, Yijie [1 ]
Tong, Xiaohua [1 ]
Atkinson, Peter M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Surveying & Geoinformat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Lancaster, Fac Sci & Technol, Lancaster LA1 4YR, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Dept Geog & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2022年 / 60卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Spatiotemporal phenomena; Spatial resolution; Remote sensing; Earth; Artificial satellites; Uncertainty; Data integration; Geographical weighting (GW); image fusion; spatial unmixing (SU); spatiotemporal fusion; LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; MODIS DATA FUSION; REFLECTANCE FUSION; TIME-SERIES; SENSED DATA; RESOLUTION; IMAGES; ENDMEMBERS;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2021.3115136
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Spatiotemporal fusion is a technique applied to create images with both fine spatial and temporal resolutions by blending images with different spatial and temporal resolutions. Spatial unmixing (SU) is a widely used approach for spatiotemporal fusion, which requires only the minimum number of input images. However, ignorance of spatial variation in land cover between pixels is a common issue in existing SU methods. For example, all coarse neighbors in a local window are treated equally in the unmixing model, which is inappropriate. Moreover, the determination of the appropriate number of clusters in the known fine spatial resolution image remains a challenge. In this article, a geographically weighted SU (SU-GW) method was proposed to address the spatial variation in land cover and increase the accuracy of spatiotemporal fusion. SU-GW is a general model suitable for any SU method. Specifically, the existing regularized version and soft classification-based version were extended with the proposed geographically weighted scheme, producing 24 versions (i.e., 12 existing versions were extended to 12 corresponding geographically weighted versions) for SU. Furthermore, the cluster validity index of Xie and Beni (XB) was introduced to determine automatically the number of clusters. A systematic comparison between the experimental results of the 24 versions indicated that SU-GW was effective in increasing the prediction accuracy. Importantly, all 12 existing methods were enhanced by integrating the SU-GW scheme. Moreover, the identified most accurate SU-GW enhanced version was demonstrated to outperform two prevailing spatiotemporal fusion approaches in a benchmark comparison. Therefore, it can be concluded that SU-GW provides a general solution for enhancing spatiotemporal fusion, which can be used to update existing methods and future potential versions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stability Analysis of Unmixing-Based Spatiotemporal Fusion Model: A Case of Land Surface Temperature Product Downscaling
    Li, Min
    Guo, Shanxin
    Chen, Jinsong
    Chang, Yuguang
    Sun, Luyi
    Zhao, Longlong
    Li, Xiaoli
    Yao, Hongming
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [32] HISTIF: A New Spatiotemporal Image Fusion Method for High-Resolution Monitoring of Crops at the Subfield Level
    Jiang, Jiale
    Zhang, Qiaofeng
    Yao, Xia
    Tian, Yongchao
    Zhu, Yan
    Cao, Weixing
    Cheng, Tao
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 13 : 4607 - 4626
  • [33] SwinSTFM: Remote Sensing Spatiotemporal Fusion Using Swin Transformer
    Chen, Guanyu
    Jiao, Peng
    Hu, Qing
    Xiao, Linjie
    Ye, Zijian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [34] Spatial and Temporal Image Fusion via Regularized Spatial Unmixing
    Xu, Yong
    Huang, Bo
    Xu, Yuyue
    Cao, Kai
    Guo, Chunlan
    Meng, Deyu
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2015, 12 (06) : 1362 - 1366
  • [35] RFSDAF: A New Spatiotemporal Fusion Method Robust to Registration Errors
    Hou, Shuwei
    Sun, Wenfang
    Guo, Baolong
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Xu, Changzhi
    Li, Xiaobo
    Shao, Yingzhao
    Li, Cheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [36] Similarity Weight Learning: A New Spatial and Temporal Satellite Image Fusion Framework
    Sun, Haoxuan
    Xiao, Wu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [37] Comparison of Spatiotemporal Fusion Models: A Review
    Chen, Bin
    Huang, Bo
    Xu, Bing
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (02) : 1798 - 1835
  • [38] A Rigorously-Weighted Spatiotemporal Fusion Model with Uncertainty Analysis
    Wang, Jing
    Huang, Bo
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (10)
  • [39] Multistream STGAN: A Spatiotemporal Image Fusion Model With Improved Temporal Transferability
    Lyu, Fangzheng
    Yang, Zijun
    Diao, Chunyuan
    Wang, Shaowen
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 18 : 1562 - 1576
  • [40] Accuracy Evaluation of Four Spatiotemporal Fusion Methods for Different Time Scales
    Yang, Meng
    Zhou, Yanting
    Xie, Yong
    Shao, Wen
    Luo, Fengyu
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 17 : 8291 - 8301