A comparative study of the influence of salt concentration on the performance of an osmotic membrane bioreactor and a sequencing batch reactor

被引:6
作者
Soler-Cabezas, Jose L. [1 ]
Lujan-Facundo, Maria J. [1 ]
Mendoza-Roca, Jose A. [1 ]
Vincent-Vela, Maria C. [1 ]
Pastor-Alcaniz, Laura [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Seguridad Ind, Valencia, Spain
[2] DAM, Parque Tecnol, Paterna, Spain
关键词
forward osmosis; osmotic membrane bioreactor; sequencing batch reactor; membrane fouling; draw solution; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; DRAW SOLUTE PERMEATION; OSMOSIS MEMBRANE; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; BIOMASS CHARACTERISTICS; PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY; RETENTION TIME; HIGH SALINITY; ACCUMULATION;
D O I
10.1002/jctb.5321
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDAn osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) is a wastewater treatment technique that presents low energy requirements, low membrane fouling and high removal of nutrients and organic matter. However, reverse salt flux is the main disadvantage because it causes conductivity increase in the bioreactor. This study compares the performance of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and an OMBR in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production. For that, the influent conductivity in the SBR was increased as this increases conductivity in the osmotic membrane bioreactor. RESULTSComparing the results obtained at two mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations in terms of membrane fouling, a concentration of 5 g L-1 of MLSS was chosen for the comparison with the SBR. The SBR achieved slightly higher COD removal efficiencies than the OMBR is spite of the accumulation of cellular debris in the membrane bioreactor. The accumulation of SMP and EPS in the OMBR was also higher than in the SBR due to the cellular debris and organic matter accumulation. In both reactors the microbial activity measured in terms of standard oxygen uptake rate decreased due to the increase of salt concentration in the bioreactor. CONCLUSIONSAs a conclusion, OMBR will be especially feasible when the draw solution is a residual stream of the same industry, like tannery wastewater or table olive processing. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes
    Achilli, Andrea
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Marchand, Eric A.
    Childress, Amy E.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 239 (1-3) : 10 - 21
  • [2] High strength domestic wastewater treatment with submerged forward osmosis membrane bioreactor
    Aftab, Bilal
    Khan, Sher Jamal
    Maqbool, Tahir
    Hankins, Nicholas P.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 72 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [3] [Anonymous], INT J ENV SCI TECHNO
  • [4] Selection of forward osmosis draw solutes for subsequent integration with anaerobic treatment to facilitate resource recovery from wastewater
    Ansari, Ashley J.
    Hai, Faisal I.
    Guo, Wenshan
    Ngo, Hao H.
    Price, William E.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 191 : 30 - 36
  • [5] APHA AWWA and WEF, 2005, STANDARD METHODS EXA
  • [6] Evaluation of forward osmosis membrane performance and fouling during long-term osmotic membrane bioreactor study
    Bell, Elizabeth A.
    Holloway, Ryan W.
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2016, 517 : 1 - 13
  • [7] Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Childress, Amy E.
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) : 70 - 87
  • [8] Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment
    Chen, Lin
    Gu, Yangshuo
    Cao, Chuqing
    Zhang, Jun
    Ng, Jing-Wen
    Tang, Chuyang
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 50 : 114 - 123
  • [9] Biological treatment processes for fish processing wastewater - A review
    Chowdhury, Pankaj
    Viraraghavan, T.
    Srinivasan, A.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (02) : 439 - 449
  • [10] Effect of membrane bioreactor configurations on sludge structure and microbial activity
    Clouzot, L.
    Roche, N.
    Marrot, B.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) : 975 - 981