Bayesian MAP model selection of chain event graphs

被引:32
作者
Freeman, G. [1 ]
Smith, J. Q. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Warwick, Dept Stat, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Chain event graphs; Bayesian model selection; Dirichlet distribution; INDEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmva.2011.03.008
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Chain event graphs are graphical models that while retaining most of the structural advantages of Bayesian networks for model interrogation, propagation and learning, more naturally encode asymmetric state spaces and the order in which events happen than Bayesian networks do. In addition, the class of models that can be represented by chain event graphs for a finite set of discrete variables is a strict superset of the class that can be described by Bayesian networks. In this paper we demonstrate how with complete sampling, conjugate closed form model selection based on product Dirichlet priors is possible, and prove that suitable homogeneity assumptions characterise the product Dirichlet prior on this class of models. We demonstrate our techniques using two educational examples. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1165
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, Introduction to Graph Theory
  • [2] Bernardo J. M., 2009, BAYESIAN THEORY, V405
  • [3] BERNARDO JM, 1979, J R STAT SOC B, V41, P113
  • [4] Boutilier C, 1996, UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P115
  • [5] CASTELO R, 2002, THESIS U UTRECHT
  • [6] Cowell Robert G., 1999, Probabilistic networks and expert systems
  • [7] Cussens J., 2008, UAI, P105
  • [8] Denison DavidG. T., 2002, WILEY SERIES PROBABI
  • [9] Geiger D, 1997, ANN STAT, V25, P1344
  • [10] A quantitative study of gene regulation involved in the immune response of anopheline mosquitoes: An application of Bayesian hierarchical clustering of curves
    Heard, NA
    Holmes, CC
    Stephens, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 101 (473) : 18 - 29