Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation Improves Pain, Range of Motion, and Self-Reported Function in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Systematic Review

被引:106
|
作者
Cross, Kevin M. [1 ]
Kuenze, Chris [2 ]
Grindstaff, Terry [3 ]
Hertel, Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] UVA Healths, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Creighton Univ, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
来源
关键词
cervical spine; manipulative therapy; manual therapy; CLINICAL-PREDICTION RULE; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; ARTERY DISSECTION; MANUAL THERAPY; ACTIVE RANGE; MANAGEMENT; EXERCISE; CARE; RELIABILITY; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2011.3670
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common diagnosis in the physical therapy setting, yet there is no gold standard for treatment. This study is part of a growing body of literature on the use of thoracic spine thrust manipulation for the treatment of individuals with mechanical neck pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation on pain, range of motion, and self-reported function in patients with mechanical neck pain. METHODS: Six online databases were comprehensively searched from their respective inception to October 2010. The primary search terms included "thoracic mobilization," "thoracic spine mobilization," "thoracic manipulation," and "thoracic spine manipulation." Of the 44 studies assessed for inclusion, 6 randomized controlled trials were retained. Between-group mean differences and effect sizes for pretreatment-to-posttreatment change scores, using Cohen's d formula, were calculated for pain, range of motion, and subjective function at all stated time intervals. RESULTS: Effect size point estimates for the pain change scores were significant for global assessment across all studies (range, 0.38-4.03) but not conclusively significant at the end range of active rotation (range, 0.02-1.79). Effect size point estimates were large among all range-of-motion change measures (range, 1.40-3.52), and the effect size point estimates of the change scores among the functional questionnaires (range, 0.47-3.64) also indicated a significant treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic spine thrust manipulation may provide short-term improvement in patients with acute or subacute mechanical neck pain. However, the body of literature is weak, and these results may not be generalizable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b-. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(9):633-642. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3670
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 642
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of cervical versus thoracic thrust manipulation for the improvement of pain, disability, and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain
    Brown, Kenneth
    Luszeck, Tyler
    Nerdin, Skyler
    Yaden, Jon
    Young, Jodi
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2014, 19 (06) : 381 - 391
  • [2] Analysis of Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation for Reducing Neck Pain
    Braun Ferreira, Luiz Alfredo
    Fath Santos, Lucas Cristiano
    Pereira, Wagner Menna
    Neto, Hugo Pasini
    College Grecco, Luanda Andre
    Lourenco Christovao, Thaluanna Calil
    Oliveira, Claudia Santos
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [3] Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review
    Young, Jodi L.
    Walker, Doug
    Snyder, Shane
    Daly, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2014, 22 (03) : 141 - 153
  • [4] Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masaracchio, Michael
    Kirker, Kaitlin
    States, Rebecca
    Hanney, William J.
    Liu, Xinliang
    Kolber, Morey
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [5] Is thoracic spine posture associated with shoulder pain, range of motion and function? A systematic review
    Barrett, Eva
    O'Keeffe, Mary
    O'Sullivan, Kieran
    Lewis, Jeremy
    McCreesh, Karen
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2016, 26 : 38 - 46
  • [6] Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation Versus Cervical Spine Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Acute Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Puentedura, Emilio J.
    Landers, Merrill R.
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Mintken, Paul
    Huijbregts, Peter
    Fernandez-De-Las-Penas, Cesar
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 41 (04): : 208 - 220
  • [7] The effect of thoracic spine manipulation on pain and disability in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
    Huisman, Palesa A.
    Speksnijder, Caroline M.
    de Wijer, Anton
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (20) : 1677 - 1685
  • [8] Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain:: A case series
    Fernandez-de-las-Peñas, Cesar
    Palomeque-del-Cerro, Luis
    Rodriguez-Blanco, Cleofas
    Gomez-Conesa, Antonia
    Miangolarra-Page, Juan C.
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 30 (04) : 312 - 320
  • [9] Immediate Changes in Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity, Neck Pain, and Cervical Range of Motion After Cervical or Thoracic Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Bilateral Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Martinez-Segura, Raquel
    Isabel De-La-Llave-Rincon, Ana
    Ortega-Santiago, Ricardo
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Fernandez-De-Las-Penas, Cesar
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 42 (09): : 806 - 814
  • [10] Manipulation Improves Outcomes for Patients with Mechanical Neck Pain
    Seffinger, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2006, 106 (11): : 642 - 643