Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 is a strong independent prognostic marker in breast cancer

被引:135
作者
Gonzalez, MA
Pinder, SE
Callagy, G
Vowler, SL
Morris, LS
Bird, K
Bell, JA
Laskey, RA
Coleman, N
机构
[1] Hutchison Med Res Council Res Ctr, MRC, Canc Cell Unit, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Appl Math Stat, Cambridge, England
[4] City Hosp Nottingham, Dept Histopathol, Nottingham, England
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2003.04.121
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that prognostic information in breast cancer may be derived from an accurate assessment of epithelial cell cycle entry, as indicated by expression of minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins. Materials and Methods: We used immunohistochemistry to examine the distribution of Mcm-2 in breast tissue. Power calculations based on a pilot study of 67 whole tissue sections led to selection of an independent 347-core breast carcinoma tissue microarray validation set. We tested for associations between Mcm-2 (and Ki-67) labeling index (LI) and various clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Mcm-2 was expressed more frequently than the standard proliferation marker Ki-67 in whole tissue sections of normal breast (P = .0003) and breast carcinoma (P < .0001). In 221 assessable cores of invasive carcinoma, the Mcm-2 LI showed a positive association with tumor size (P = .002), mitotic index (P < .0001), histologic grade (P < .0001), and the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) score (P < .0001). Using a cutoff value of 50%, Mcm-2 LI was associated with overall survival (P = .0007), disease-free interval (P = .0002), and with the development of regional recurrence (P = .011) and distant metastases (P = .0016). Cox regression analysis suggested that the Mcm-2 LI is a strong prognostic factor in breast cancer that is independent and superior to histologic grade, lymph node stage, and Ki-67 LI, but not the NPI score. Conclusion: Mcm-2 may be of utility as a prognostic marker to refine the prediction of outcome in breast cancer, for example when combined with parameters currently used in the NPI. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:4306 / 4313
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer
    Altman, DG
    Lyman, GH
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1998, 52 (1-3) : 289 - 303
  • [2] SIMULTANEOUS STAINING OF EXPONENTIALLY GROWING VERSUS PLATEAU PHASE CELLS WITH THE PROLIFERATION-ASSOCIATED ANTIBODY KI-67 AND PROPIDIUM IODIDE - ANALYSIS BY FLOW-CYTOMETRY
    BAISCH, H
    GERDES, J
    [J]. CELL AND TISSUE KINETICS, 1987, 20 (04): : 387 - 391
  • [3] DNA replication in eukaryotic cells
    Bell, SP
    Dutta, A
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 71 : 333 - 374
  • [4] Replication licensing - defining the proliferative state?
    Blow, JJ
    Hodgson, B
    [J]. TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) : 72 - 78
  • [5] CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-H
  • [7] DO WE REALLY NEED PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR BREAST-CANCER
    CLARK, GM
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 30 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [8] Daidone M G, 2001, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P27
  • [9] Analysis of minichromosome maintenance proteins as a novel method for detection of colorectal cancer in stool
    Davies, RJ
    Freeman, A
    Morris, LS
    Bingham, S
    Dilworth, S
    Scott, I
    Laskey, RA
    Miller, R
    Coleman, N
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9321) : 1917 - 1919
  • [10] ELLIS IO, 1992, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V20, P479