Removal of hexavalent chromium in dual-chamber microbial fuel cells separated by different ion exchange membranes

被引:85
作者
Wang, Heming [1 ,2 ]
Song, Xueyong [2 ]
Zhang, Huihui [2 ]
Tan, Pan [2 ]
Kong, Fanxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Beijing Key Lab Oil & Gas Pollut Control, State Key Lab Heavy Oil Proc, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Coll Chem Engn & Environm, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Hexavalent chromium; Removal mechanism; Ion exchange membrane; Membrane fouling; Microbial fuel cell; MODIFIED GRAPHITE FELTS; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; WASTE-WATER; METAL RECOVERY; REDUCTION; GENERATION; PERFORMANCE; TRANSPORT; ANION; ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121459
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An ion exchange membrane (IEM) is an important component in dual-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) to separate cathodic chromium from anode bacteria to avoid toxicity. Common used IEMs (e.g., BPM, CEM, PEM, AEM) have different ionic transfer abilities which could influence MFC performance and chromium removal. Additionally, to distinguish chromium "removal" or "reduction" by MFCs, the chromium removal in this study was further analyzed into cathodic reduction, adsorption on the membrane and permeation through membrane to the anode chamber. It was found that BPM achieved the best performance in removing hexavalent chromium (99.4 +/- 0.2 %) and balancing pH and conductivity in both chambers, followed by AEM (97.9 +/- 0.8 %) and CEM (95.6 +/- 0.8 %), while PEM can not well maintain pH and conductivity leading to the worst anode performance and lowest chromium removal efficiency. However, the adsorption of chromium on the AEM accounts for 91.1 +/- 0.7 %, which was much higher than the other three membranes. The permeation of chromium through the membrane were all lower than 0.2% which can be ignored. SEM and EDS results showed that chromium deposits and bacteria were detected on the membrane facing cahtode and anode, respectively, indicating that membrane scaling and fouling were inevitable and happened within 24 h operation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Transport of hexavalent chromium through anion-exchange membranes
    Çengeloglu, Y
    Tor, A
    Kir, E
    Ersöz, M
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2003, 154 (03) : 239 - 246
  • [2] Mass transport through a proton exchange membrane (Nafion) in microbial fuel cells
    Chae, Kyu Jung
    Choi, Mijin
    Ajayi, Folusho F.
    Park, Wooshin
    Chang, In Seop
    Kim, In S.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2008, 22 (01) : 169 - 176
  • [3] Alkali production from bipolar membrane electrodialysis powered by microbial fuel cell and application for biogas upgrading
    Chen, Man
    Zhang, Fang
    Zhang, Yan
    Zeng, Raymond J.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 103 : 428 - 434
  • [4] Recovery of silver from wastewater coupled with power generation using a microbial fuel cell
    Choi, Chansoo
    Cui, Yufeng
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 107 : 522 - 525
  • [5] Effects of biofouling on ion transport through cation exchange membranes and microbial fuel cell performance
    Choi, Mi-Jin
    Chae, Kyu-Jung
    Ajayi, Folusho F.
    Kim, Kyoung-Yeol
    Yu, Hye-Weon
    Kim, Chang-won
    Kim, In S.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) : 298 - 303
  • [6] Effect of formation of biofilms and chemical scale on the cathode electrode on the performance of a continuous two-chamber microbial fuel cell
    Chung, Kyungmi
    Fujiki, Itto
    Okabe, Satoshi
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (01) : 355 - 360
  • [7] Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Microbial Fuel Cells: A Review
    Das, Suparna
    Dutta, Kingshuk
    Rana, Dipak
    [J]. POLYMER REVIEWS, 2018, 58 (04) : 610 - 629
  • [8] Separators used in microbial electrochemical technologies: Current status and future prospects
    Daud, Siti Mariam
    Kim, Byung Hong
    Ghasemi, Mostafa
    Daud, Wan Ramli Wan
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 170 - 179
  • [9] Bioelectrochemical Chromium(VI) Removal in Plant-Microbial Fuel Cells
    Habibul, Nuzahat
    Hu, Yi
    Wang, Yun-Kun
    Chen, Wei
    Yu, Han-Qing
    Sheng, Guo-Ping
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (07) : 3882 - 3889
  • [10] Hao Xiao-Xuan, 2014, China Environmental Science, V34, P2581