Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography

被引:48
作者
Livingston, Edward H.
Miller, Jordan A. G.
Coan, Brian
Rege, Robert V.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Endocrinol Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Vet Adm N Texas Hlth Care Syst, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
关键词
intraoperative cholangiography; choledocholithiasis; national inpatient survey; comorbidity; cost effectiveness analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-007-0209-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) has been advocated as a viable strategy to reduce common bile duct injury (CDI) during cholecystectomy. This is predicated, in part, on the low cost of IOC, making it a cost-effective preventive strategy. Using billed hospital charges as a proxy for costs, we sought to estimate costs associated with the performance of IOC. Methods The 2001 National Inpatient Survey (NIS) database was assessed for IOC utilization and associated charges. Average charges for hospital admission where the primary procedure was laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared for those associated with and without the performance of IOC. Results Eighteen percent of cholecystectomies were performed in facilities that never perform IOC. Routine IOC (defined as > 75% of cholecystectomies performed in any one hospital having a concomitant IOC) was performed in only 11% of hospitals. In the remaining 71% of hospitals, selective IOC was performed. IOCs were associated with US $706-739 in additional hospital charges when performed in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We project a cost of US $371, 356 to prevent a single bile duct injury by using routine cholangiography. Conclusion We conclude that only a minority of hospitals performs cholecystectomies with routine IOC. Because of the significant amount of hospital charges attributable to IOC, routine IOC is not cost-effective as a preventative measure against bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1162 / 1167
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES QU, 2003, HCUP NAT INP SAMPL D
[2]  
BERCI G, 1995, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V9, P1244
[3]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[4]  
FLETCHER DR, 1995, SURG ENDOSC, V9, P1230
[5]   LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - RESULTS AND INDICATIONS [J].
FLOWERS, JL ;
ZUCKER, KA ;
GRAHAM, SM ;
SCOVILL, WA ;
IMBEMBO, AL ;
BAILEY, RW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 215 (03) :209-216
[6]   A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Flum, DR ;
Flowers, C ;
Veenstra, DL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 196 (03) :385-393
[7]   Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography - Adverse outcome or preventable error? [J].
Flum, DR ;
Koepsell, T ;
Heagerty, P ;
Sinanan, M ;
Dellinger, EP .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (11) :1287-1292
[8]  
Ladocsi LT, 1997, AM SURGEON, V63, P150
[9]   Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury [J].
Livingston, EH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (04) :459-459
[10]   ROUTINE VERSUS SELECTIVE INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY [J].
PHILLIPS, EH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :505-507