A private channel of nitrogen alleviates interspecific competition for an annual legume

被引:8
作者
Elias, J. D. [1 ]
Agrawal, A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
context dependency; Fabaceae; mutualism; nitrogen fertilization; plant competition; plant-microbe interactions; rhizobia; trade-offs; CONTEXT-DEPENDENCY; PLANT DIVERSITY; AMPHICARPAEA-BRACTEATA; DEPOSITION; CONSEQUENCES; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; FIXATION; PATTERNS; RHIZOBIA;
D O I
10.1002/ecy.3449
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The way resource availability predictably alters interspecific interactions and may favor one resource-acquisition strategy over another is critical for understanding context dependency. The ubiquity of nitrogen (N) limitation across terrestrial environments is a driver of plant competition and the association of some plants with N-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) may alleviate competition with nonfixing plants. Conversely, when available soil N is elevated, competitive advantages imparted by rhizobia are hypothesized to decline because nonfixing species are able to acquire those nutrients readily. We manipulated competition, soil N, and soil microbial inoculation, employing the ground bean Amphicarpaea bracteata, a native annual N-fixing legume, and jewelweed Impatiens capensis, a native co-occurring nonfixing annual. We found that legume performance was negatively impacted by interspecific competition, but less so under lower soil N in both the greenhouse and field. The legume invested a greater proportion of resources in rhizobia when competing, but only under low N. Also consistent with predictions, a competition-by-microbial-inoculation interaction demonstrated that negative effects of competition were alleviated by rhizobia. Finally, we detected an interaction between inoculation and fertilization, whereby N addition resulted in increased performance for uninoculated legumes, but a small decline in performance for inoculated plants, the latter likely representing a cost of mutualism. Thus, several lines of evidence point to the legume-rhizobia mutualism being more beneficial under competition and limited soil N. Competing I. capensis, in contrast, benefited from N addition regardless of the addition of soil microbes. In a survey of natural populations, legume and rhizobia growth were positively correlated at population edges (where interspecific competition is expected to be higher, the mutualism is stronger), whereas at population centers we found no association. Isotopic evidence confirmed a higher degree of rhizobial N-fixation at population edges compared to centers. Taken together, our results demonstrate an important role for the largely private channel of nitrogen in legume competitive performance, but with the benefits imparted by rhizobia being predictably weaker at higher soil fertility. We speculate that alleviation of competitive impacts through resource partitioning is an important and yet largely overlooked aspect of the evolutionary ecology of legume-rhizobia interactions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   NITROGEN SATURATION IN NORTHERN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS [J].
ABER, JD ;
NADELHOFFER, KJ ;
STEUDLER, P ;
MELILLO, JM .
BIOSCIENCE, 1989, 39 (06) :378-386
[2]   A scale-dependent framework for trade-offs, syndromes, and specialization in organismal biology [J].
Agrawal, Anurag A. .
ECOLOGY, 2020, 101 (02)
[3]   Negotiation, Sanctions, and Context Dependency in the Legume-Rhizobium Mutualism [J].
Akcay, Erol ;
Simms, Ellen L. .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2011, 178 (01) :1-14
[4]  
Allos H. F., 1955, Proceedings. Soil Science Society of America, V19, P182
[5]  
Azad Md Salim, 2013, Forest Science and Practice, V15, P274, DOI 10.1007/s11632-013-0416-2
[6]   Coevolution of Cyanogenic Bamboos and Bamboo Lemurs on Madagascar [J].
Ballhorn, Daniel J. ;
Rakotoarivelo, Fanny Patrika ;
Kautz, Stefanie .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08)
[7]  
Berendse F., 1993, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY ST, P104, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2318-1
[8]   Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis [J].
Bobbink, R. ;
Hicks, K. ;
Galloway, J. ;
Spranger, T. ;
Alkemade, R. ;
Ashmore, M. ;
Bustamante, M. ;
Cinderby, S. ;
Davidson, E. ;
Dentener, F. ;
Emmett, B. ;
Erisman, J. -W. ;
Fenn, M. ;
Gilliam, F. ;
Nordin, A. ;
Pardo, L. ;
De Vries, W. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2010, 20 (01) :30-59
[9]  
Bronstein JL, 2001, AM ZOOL, V41, P825, DOI 10.1668/0003-1569(2001)041[0825:TCOM]2.0.CO
[10]  
2