Types of deception and underlying motivation - What people think

被引:51
作者
Utz, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
deception; motivation; attribution;
D O I
10.1177/0894439304271534
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In computer-mediated communication, there are various types of possible deception such as category deception (gender switching), attractiveness deception, or identity concealment. The present article argues that it is meaningful to differentiate among these types of deception. More specifically, it is assumed that people attribute the various types of deception to different motivations and that these assumed motivations determine the evaluation of the deception. To examine whether individuals indeed attribute different types of deception to different underlying motivations, a scenario study was conducted. The results were in line with the expectations. For example, identity concealment was mainly attributed to privacy concerns, whereas gender switching was mainly perceived as playing with new roles and unknown aspects of the self. The assumed malicious intention predicted the evaluation of the deception.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Goffman E., 1986, FRAME ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1177/0265407515616876
[12]  
Hample D., 1980, Southern Speech Communication Journal, V46, P33, DOI DOI 10.1080/10417948009372474
[13]   Explanations for the perpetration of and reactions to deception in a virtual community [J].
Joinson, AN ;
Dietz-Uhler, B .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2002, 20 (03) :275-289
[14]   ATTRIBUTION OF ATTITUDES [J].
JONES, EE ;
HARRIS, VA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 3 (01) :1-24
[15]   Meaning and identity in "cyberspace": The performance of gender, class, and race online [J].
Kendall, L .
SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 1998, 21 (02) :129-153
[16]   SELF-PRESENTATION IN PERSONAL ADVERTISEMENTS - THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLICIT NOTIONS OF ATTRACTION AND ROLE EXPECTATIONS [J].
KOESTNER, R ;
WHEELER, L .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1988, 5 (02) :149-160
[17]   CATEGORIES FOR ACCEPTABILITY OF LIES [J].
LINDSKOLD, S ;
WALTERS, PS .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 120 (01) :129-136
[18]  
*PEW INT PROJ, 2000, TRUST PRIV ONL WHY A
[19]   Enter your e-mail address: How German Internet users manage their e-mail addresses [J].
Utz, S .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2004, 7 (02) :241-246
[20]   Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction [J].
Walther, JB .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1996, 23 (01) :3-43