A systematic literature review of classroom observation protocols and their adequacy foe engineering education in active learning environments

被引:13
作者
Guimaraes, Leovani Marcial [1 ]
Lima, Renato da Silva [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Itajuba UNIFEI, Inst Ind Engn & Management IEPG, Itajuba, MG, Brazil
关键词
Classroom observation protocol; engineering education; active learning; value proposition; systematic literature review; OBSERVATION INSTRUMENT; STUDENT RESISTANCE; TEACHING PRACTICES; SCIENCE; VALIDATION; ENGAGEMENT; COLLEGE; MATHEMATICS; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2021.1937946
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This research discusses the characteristics of a global set of Classroom Observation Protocols (COPr) to uncover their design goals and assess the value propositions for Engineering Education (EE) in active learning environments. To achieve the research purpose, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method was chosen, based on a process-oriented model that covered a set of 23 global databases, from January 2000 to December 2020. The search and screening process retained 109 literature sources for deep study, after quality assessment. The research results revealed the approaches of 111 classroom observation applications and 68 different protocols. The upward trend of new protocols and applications in the last 6 years identified by the study has resulted in considerable information overload for practitioners. The authors address this by analysing the 68 protocols, characterising them and listing the strengths of each one aligned with the EE context. They achieve this goal by applying a systematic 4-category and 5-dimension framework to compare the protocols. The bibliometric data also reveals how the observation strategies in active learning environments incorporate Engineering disciplines in several applications over time, with 82% of the total.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 930
页数:23
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Adams S. G., 2008, IEEE ENG MANAGEMENT, V9, DOI [10.1109/EMR.2009.4804350, DOI 10.1109/EMR.2009.4804350]
[2]  
Albaum G, 1997, J MARKET RES SOC, V39, P331
[3]  
ALI N, 2017, ACT LEARN HIGH EDUC
[4]   Observing Classroom Engagement in Community College: A Systematic Approach [J].
Alicea, Stacey ;
Suarez-Orozco, Carola ;
Singh, Sukhmani ;
Darbes, Tasha ;
Abrica, Elvira Julia .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2016, 38 (04) :757-782
[5]   Peer observations among faculty in a college of education: investigating the summative and formative uses of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) [J].
Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey ;
Popp, Sharon E. Osborn .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2012, 24 (01) :5-24
[6]  
Arthurs L., 2018, 2018 ASEE C EXP
[7]   Observable mathematical teaching expertise among upper elementary teachers: connections to student experiences and professional learning [J].
Auletto, Amy ;
Stein, Kristy Cooper .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 23 (05) :433-461
[8]   Characterizing college science instruction: The Three-Dimensional Learning Observation Protocol [J].
Bain, Kinsey ;
Bender, Lydia ;
Bergeron, Paul ;
Caballero, Marcos D. ;
Carmel, Justin H. ;
Duffy, Erin M. ;
Ebert-May, Diane ;
Fata-Hartley, Cori L. ;
Herrington, Deborah G. ;
Laverty, James T. ;
Matz, Rebecca L. ;
Nelson, Paul C. ;
Posey, Lynmarie A. ;
Stoltzfus, Jon R. ;
Stowe, Ryan L. ;
Sweeder, Ryan D. ;
Tessmer, Stuart H. ;
Underwood, Sonia M. ;
Urban-Lurain, Mark ;
Cooper, Melanie M. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06)
[9]   Qualities of classroom observation systems [J].
Bell, Courtney A. ;
Dobbelaer, Marjoleine J. ;
Klette, Kirsti ;
Visscher, Adrie .
SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, 2019, 30 (01) :3-29
[10]   An Argument Approach to Observation Protocol Validity [J].
Bell, Courtney A. ;
Gitomer, Drew H. ;
McCaffrey, Daniel F. ;
Hamre, Bridget K. ;
Pianta, Robert C. ;
Qi, Yi .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (2-3) :62-87