Meta analysis of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer patients: Clinical value of DWI and ADC value

被引:16
作者
Xing, Hua [1 ]
Song, Chang-long [1 ]
Li, Wen-jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, China Japan Union Hosp, Breast Surg Dept, Xian Tai St 126, Changchun 130033, Jilin Province, Peoples R China
关键词
Meta analysis; Diffusion weighted imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Lymph node metastases; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; DCE-MRI; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; CONTRAST; METAANALYSIS; COEFFICIENT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.019
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of DWI in the assessment of node metastases and investigate whether the ADC value could be used to discriminate between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: 13 studies with a total of 676 metastatic and 811 non-metastatic lymph nodes were included. Results: (1) The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DWI were 0.83, 0.82, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. The PLR and NLR were 4.95 and 0.23, respectively. The AUC and Q* index were 0.91 and 0.85, respectively. (2) The ADC value of metastatic lymph nodes was lower than non-metastatic lymph nodes (WMD= 0.213, 95% CI 0.349 to 0.076, Z = 3.05, P<0.05). (3) Subgroup meta-analysis of the group of b(0800): The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DWI were 0.86, 0.86, 0.82 and 0.90, respectively. The PLR and NLR were 6.76 and 0.18, respectively. The AUC and Q* index were 0.93 and 0.87. The ADC value of metastatic lymph nodes was lower than non-metastatic lymph nodes( WMD = 0.267, 95% CI 0.348 to 0.185, Z= 6.40, P<0.05). Conclusions: DWI and ADC value appear to be a reliable method to differentiate metastatic and non metastatic lymph nodes. The combination of b =0 and 800 sImm2 resulted in higher diagnostic accuracy and more pronounced ADC value difference. If only a couple of b values are used, those of b =0 and 800 s/mm(2) are recommended. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1137
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors [J].
Belli, Paolo ;
Costantini, Melania ;
Bufi, Enida ;
Giardina, Giuseppe Giovanni ;
Rinaldi, Pierluigi ;
Franceschini, Gianluca ;
Bonomo, Lorenzo .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (03) :268-276
[2]  
[陈皓 Chen Hao], 2014, [中国介入影像与治疗学, Chinese Jorunal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy], V11, P92
[3]  
[陈泉桦 Chen Quanhua], 2014, [磁共振成像, Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging], V5, P264
[4]   Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer [J].
Choi, S. Y. ;
Chang, Y-W ;
Park, H. J. ;
Kim, H. J. ;
Hong, S. S. ;
Seo, D. Y. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1016) :E474-E479
[5]   Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer [J].
Chung, Jin ;
Youk, Ji Hyun ;
Kim, Jeong-Ah ;
Gweon, Hye Mi ;
Kim, Eun-Kyung ;
Ryu, Young Hoon ;
Son, Eun Ju .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (08) :909-916
[6]  
Donker Mila, 2015, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V159, pA9302
[7]   Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Dorrius, Monique D. ;
Dijkstra, Hildebrand ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
Sijens, Paul E. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (11) :2835-2847
[8]   Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy [J].
Ergul, Nurhan ;
Kadioglu, Huseyin ;
Yildiz, Seyma ;
Yucel, Serap Baskaya ;
Gucin, Zuhal ;
Erdogan, Ezgi Basak ;
Aydin, Mehmet ;
Muslumanoglu, Mahmut .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (08) :917-923
[9]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer [J].
Fornasa, Francesca ;
Nesoti, Maria Vittoria ;
Bovo, Chiara ;
Bonavina, Maria Giuseppina .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (04) :858-864
[10]  
Garbay J R, 2002, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V30, P514, DOI 10.1016/S1297-9589(02)00361-2