A meta-analysis of published literature on waist-to-hip ratio and risk of breast cancer
被引:104
作者:
Connolly, BS
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, CanadaOntario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Connolly, BS
[1
]
Barnett, C
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, CanadaOntario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Barnett, C
[1
]
Vogt, KN
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, CanadaOntario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Vogt, KN
[1
]
Li, T
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, CanadaOntario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Li, T
[1
]
Stone, J
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, CanadaOntario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Stone, J
[1
]
Boyd, NF
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, CanadaOntario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Boyd, NF
[1
]
机构:
[1] Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
来源:
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
|
2002年
/
44卷
/
02期
关键词:
D O I:
10.1207/S15327914NC4402_02
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Epidemiological studies have identified body weight as a risk factor for breast cancer Beyond the amount of adipose tissue a woman has, its distribution, particularly abdominally, maybe a risk-factor in breast cancer etiology. Body fat distribution is commonly measured by a waist-to-hip circumference ratio (WHR). We performed a meta-analysis to summarize the published literature on WHR and breast cancer risk. After assembling all published studies, we extracted mean WHRs for study participants and adjusted risk estimates comparing highest with lowest Partition of WHR and calculated weighted mean differences in WHR between cases and noncases and summary risk estimates based on study design and menopausal status. The weighted mean difference was 0.016 [95% confidence interval (U) = 0.005-0.028] for all studies combined. The summary risk estimates were 1.80 (95% CI = 1.29-2.50) for case-control studies and 1.27 (95% CI = 1.07-1.51)for cohort studies. By menopausal status, the summary risks were 1.79 (95% CI = 1.22-2.62) for premenopausal women and 1.50(95% CI = 1.10-2.04)for postmenopausal women. For all studies combined, the summary risk was 1.62 (95% CI = 1.28-2.04). This meta-analysis indicates that a greater WHR is associated with increased risk of breast cancer and suggests that the avoidance of abdominal obesity may reduce risk of the disease.