AMICAI: A Method Based on Risk Analysis to Integrate Responsible Research and Innovation into the Work of Research and Innovation Practitioners

被引:3
作者
Brandl, Christopher [1 ]
Wille, Matthias [1 ]
Nelles, Jochen [1 ]
Rasche, Peter [1 ]
Schaefer, Katharina [1 ]
Flemisch, Frank O. [1 ]
Frenz, Martin [1 ]
Nitsch, Verena [1 ]
Mertens, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Ind Engn & Ergon, Bergdriesch 27, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ELSA; ELSI; RRI; Technology assessment; Risk analysis; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; ERGONOMIC ANALYSIS; FAILURE MODE; MANAGEMENT; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; CRITERIA; SYSTEMS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-019-00114-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The integration of ethics into the day-to-day work of research and innovation (R&I) is an important but difficult challenge. However, with the Aachen method for identification, classification and risk analysis of innovation-based problems (AMICAI) an approach from an engineering perspective is presented that enables the integration of ethical, legal and social implications into the day-to-day work of R&I practitioners. AMICAI appears in particular capable of providing a procedural guidance for R&I practitioners based on a method established in engineering science, breaking down the object of consideration into partial aspects and prioritizing the innovation-based problems in dependence of potential risk. This enables the user to apply AMICAI continuously during all stages of the research and development (R&D) process and to analyze and choose between certain sociotechnical alternatives. In this way, problems that affect ethical, legal, and social aspects can be understood, reflected and considered in the mostly technically focused R&D process. The paper gives a general guidance about AMICAI by describing principles and assumptions, providing the steps of analysis and application aids, giving an example application, explaining the necessary adjustments of AMICAI compared to the methodical basis of failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis and discussing the advantages and limits. AMICAI's simple applications can stimulate interdisciplinary cooperation in the R&D process and be a starting point for the development of an "open RRI risk analysis platform" allowing society to evaluate innovation-based problems.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 689
页数:23
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Achterkamp Marjolein C., 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.001
  • [2] Revisiting Risk Governance of GM Plants: The Need to Consider New and Emerging Gene-Editing Techniques
    Agapito-Tenfen, Sarah Z.
    Okoli, Arinze S.
    Bernstein, Michael J.
    Wikmark, Odd-Gunnar
    Myhr, Anne I.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Responsible Innovation, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118551424.CH3
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, 45211 VDI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, ENTERP WORK INNOV ST
  • [6] Scientists versus Regulators: Precaution, Novelty & Regulatory Oversight as Predictors of Perceived Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials
    Beaudrie, Christian E. H.
    Satterfield, Terre
    Kandlikar, Milind
    Harthorn, Barbara H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [7] Boenink M, 2010, STUDIES ETHICS LAW T
  • [8] Brandl C., 2016, ARBEITSWISSENSCHAFT, V70, P89
  • [9] Effect of sampling interval on the reliability using the Ovako working posture analysing of ergonomic analysis system (OWAS)
    Brandl, Christopher
    Mertens, Alexander
    Schlick, Christopher M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2017, 57 : 68 - 73
  • [10] Ergonomic analysis of working postures using OWAS in semi-trailer assembly, applying an individual sampling strategy
    Brandl, Christopher
    Mertens, Alexander
    Schlick, Christopher M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 110 - 117