Changes in yield and yield stability of durum wheat genotypes (triticum turgidum ssp. Durum) under different environments and water regimes

被引:3
|
作者
Jallouli, Salma [1 ,5 ]
Chamekh, Zoubeir [2 ]
Ayadi, Sawsen [1 ]
Zouari, Ines [1 ,3 ]
Chabchoub, Houcem [1 ]
Hammami, Zied [4 ]
Karmous, Chahine [1 ]
Trifa, Youssef [1 ]
机构
[1] Carthage Univ, Natl Inst Agron Tunisia INAT, Lab Genet & Cereal Breeding, LR14 AGR01, Tunis 1082, Tunisia
[2] Carthage Univ, Natl Inst Agr Res Tunisia, Field Crop Lab, LR16 INRAT02,Rue Hedi Karray, Tunis 1082, Tunisia
[3] Sousse Univ, Higher Inst Agron Chott Meriam, Lab Genet & Cereal Breeding, LR14 AGR01,Post Box 47,4042 Chott Meriem, Sousse 13, Tunisia
[4] Int Ctr Biosaline Agr ICBA, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[5] Carthage Univ, Higher Inst Preparatory Studies Biol & Geol Soukr, Ariana 2036, Tunisia
关键词
Triticum durum; Grain yield; Irrigation regime; Yield stability; Drought; GRAIN-YIELD; DROUGHT; PROGRESS; STRESS;
D O I
10.1007/s42976-021-00197-3
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Maintaining high grain yield and genotype performance stability under drought stress is a challenging objective for wheat breeders. This study aims to investigate the agronomic performance of six durum wheat genotypes, grown during three cropping seasons (2017, 2018 and 2019) at three locations in Tunisia: Medenine (south, arid climate) and Kairouan (center, semiarid climate) under two irrigation regimes and Kodia (north, sub-humid climate) under rainfed conditions. We analyzed for these genotypes their responsiveness to these environments through yield components at maturity. Results showed that highest grain yield was recorded under rainfed conditions in the sub-humid region with no significant variability between genotypes. The experiments in semiarid and arid areas were carried out as the combinations (site/year) and were denoted as Environments E1 (Kairouan 2017), E2 (Kairouan 2018) and E3 (Medenine 2019). A significant effect of the interaction genotype by environment (G x E) was observed in all environments, this effect was explained by the variability among climatic factors from one environment to another. Results showed that all the genotypes gave their highest yields in E1. The most productive genotype was Khiar followed by ON15 and YT13 as tolerant genotypes. The susceptible ON66 genotype gave the lowest yield in this environment. Using the stress susceptibility percentage index (SSPI(GY)), results showed that ON15 (11%), Maali (23%) and YT13 (27%) seemed to be more tolerant than Khiar (42%), ON58 (48%) and ON66 (63%) in E1. Stability analysis revealed that according to GY stability ranking, Khiar, Maali, YT13 and ON15 are the most stable genotypes. The tolerant genotype YT13 showed the best stable response and the most performing one contrariwise to the susceptible genotype ON66 which showed the worst performance for GY and lowest yield stability. These results lead to conclude that this pair of genotypes (YT13 and ON66) has an interesting contrasting behavior and could be useful for comparative study in understanding drought tolerance mechanisms and for upcoming breeding programs based on adaptability to Tunisian climates.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 558
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Changes in yield and yield stability of durum wheat genotypes (triticum turgidum ssp. Durum) under different environments and water regimes
    Salma Jallouli
    Zoubeir Chamekh
    Sawsen Ayadi
    Ines Zouari
    Houcem Chabchoub
    Zied Hammami
    Chahine Karmous
    Youssef Trifa
    Cereal Research Communications, 2022, 50 : 549 - 558
  • [2] Genetic interaction and inheritance of important traits in durum (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) x emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccum) crosses under two water regimes
    Mohammadi, Majid
    Mirlohi, Aghafakhr
    Majidi, Mohammad Mahdi
    Moghaddam, Mohsen Esmaeilzadeh
    Rabbani, Farzaneh
    Noori, Fatemeh
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2021, 72 (11): : 874 - 890
  • [3] Registration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) sources of resistance to Hessian fly
    Daba, Sintayehu D.
    Nemacheck, Jill A.
    Ohm, Herbert W.
    Bockelman, Harold E.
    Williams, Christie E.
    Mohammadi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS, 2020, 14 (03) : 445 - 449
  • [4] Gamma radiosensitivity study on wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum)
    Ahumada-Flores, Sergio
    Fernanda Briceno-Zamora, Maria
    Alberto Garcia-Montoya, Jesus
    Lopez-Cazarez, Carolina
    Esequiel Pereo-Galvez, Angel
    Isela Parra-Cota, Fannie
    de los Santos-Villalobos, Sergio
    OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 5 (01): : 558 - 562
  • [5] Simulation of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp Durum) growth under different water and nitrogen regimes in a Mediterranean environment using CropSyst
    Pala, M
    Stockle, CO
    Harris, HC
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 51 (02) : 147 - 163
  • [6] Inheritance of β-carotene concentration in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum)
    Meenakshi Santra
    D. K. Santra
    V. S. Rao
    S. P. Taware
    S. A. Tamhankar
    Euphytica, 2005, 144 : 215 - 221
  • [7] Transfer of Soft Kernel Texture from Triticum aestivum to Durum Wheat, Triticum turgidum ssp. durum
    Morris, Craig F.
    Simeone, Marco C.
    King, G. E.
    Lafiandra, Domenico
    CROP SCIENCE, 2011, 51 (01) : 114 - 122
  • [8] Contribution of Wild Relatives to Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) Yield Stability across Contrasted Environments
    Aberkane, Hafid
    Amri, Ahmed
    Belkadi, Bouchra
    Filali-Maltouf, Abdelkarim
    Valkoun, Jan
    Kehel, Zakaria
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [9] Association Mapping of Drought Tolerance Indices in Ethiopian Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum)
    Negisho, Kefyalew
    Shibru, Surafel
    Matros, Andrea
    Pillen, Klaus
    Ordon, Frank
    Wehner, Gwendolin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [10] The Effect of Drought Stress on Grain Yield, Yield Components and some Quality Traits of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp durum) Cultivars
    Kilic, Hasan
    Yagbasanlar, Tacettin
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2010, 38 (01) : 164 - 170