A new setting criterion of tailrace surge chambers for pumped-storage power plants

被引:3
|
作者
Huang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Kailin [2 ]
Ma, Jiming [1 ]
Xu, Yaowu [3 ]
Guo, Xinlei [2 ]
Wang, Jue [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[3] State Grid Xinyuan Co Ltd, Technol Ctr, Beijing 100161, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pumped-storage power plant; Tailrace surge chamber; Head loss; Load rejection; Water hammer; TURBINE GOVERNING SYSTEM; PRESSURIZED CONDUITS; DYNAMIC-ANALYSIS; WATER-HAMMER; TRANSIENT; LOAD; PENSTOCK; CLOSURE; TANK;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To determine the conditions under which a pumped-storage power plant (PSPP) requires a tailrace surge chamber and to account for the time sequence superposition of water hammer vacuum, velocity head vacuum and head loss vacuum, we derived a new setting criterion using the rigid water hammer theory. Next, several setting criteria of tailrace surge chambers are investigated, and comparisons among them are conducted for certain PSPPs. The results show that the critical length of tailrace system (CLTS) calculated by the Chinese empirical discriminant are much larger, resulting in an adverse impact on safe operation; according to the American empirical discriminant, Tongbai and Heimifeng PSPPs with large safety margins in the draft tube need to set up the tailrace surge chambers, leading to unnecessary waste; for Tongbai and Yixing PSPPs with large differences in head loss and guide vane closing law, only 5 8 m difference in CLTS is acquired based on the Japanese empirical discriminant, which is not practical; the discriminant results obtained by the new setting criterion are consistent with the actual setting conditions, and it is more realistic to incorporate the effective closing time of guide vane and the relative head loss coefficient into the influencing factors. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 201
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surge Wave Propagation in a Common Tailrace Channel for Two Large Pumped-Storage Plants
    Terrier, Stephane
    Bieri, Martin
    De Cesare, Giovanni
    Schleiss, Anton J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (02) : 218 - 225
  • [2] The impact of pumped-storage plants on the European power system
    Moser, A.
    Linnemann, C.
    Lichtinghagen, J.
    Bongers, T.
    International Journal on Hydropower and Dams, 2013, 20 (05): : 47 - 51
  • [3] Improving the Energy Efficiency of Pumped-Storage Power Plants
    Artyukh S.F.
    Galat V.V.
    Kuz’min V.V.
    Chervonenko I.I.
    Shakaryan Y.G.
    Sokur P.V.
    Power Technol. Eng., 5 (396-399): : 396 - 399
  • [4] Level control of pumped-storage hydro power plants
    Vinatoru, M.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION, QUALITY AND TESTING, ROBOTICS (AQTR 2008), THETA 16TH EDITION, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 43 - 47
  • [5] Prospect of new pumped-storage power station
    Jingyan Li
    Chuanbao Yi
    Sujie Gao
    Global Energy Interconnection, 2019, 2 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [6] Modeling of power-generating structures at pumped-storage power plants
    Vasil'ev Yu.S.
    Elistratov V.V.
    Kubyshkin L.I.
    Power Technology and Engineering, 2007, 41 (4) : 191 - 196
  • [7] Experience of EDF in the field of French pumped-storage power plants
    Ursat, Xavier
    Jacquet-Francillon, Henri
    Rafai, Isabelle
    HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU, 2012, (03): : 32 - 36
  • [8] A Contribution to Water Hammer Analysis in Pumped-Storage Power Plants
    Hoeller, Stefan
    Jaberg, Helmut
    WASSERWIRTSCHAFT, 2013, 103 (1-2) : 78 - 84
  • [9] Electric Fundamentals of Large Pumped-Storage Power Plants.
    Uhlemann, Karlheinz
    Energietechnik Leipzig, 1980, 30 (04): : 127 - 132